The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2012, 09:07 PM   #991
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
And the tweet goes on...Romney's to Big Bird threat still has legs a week later...

Name:  big-bird-debate-romney1.jpg
Views: 1004
Size:  66.2 KB

"Big Bird, welcome to the middle class"

"Big Bird, one more of Romney's 47%"

“[Romney] is getting tough on Big Bird.
Wall Street can run wild again, but he’s bringing the hammer down on Sesame Street.”

But when asked to comment, Big Bird said he didn't want to "ruffle any feathers.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 12:18 AM   #992
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
Homeless Sesame Street characters would be good Halloween costumes.
__________________
I like my perspectives like I like my baseball caps: one size fits all.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 08:56 AM   #993
Spexxvet
Makes some feel uncomfortable
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
sad
Attached Images
 
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce
Spexxvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 11:58 AM   #994
infinite monkey
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
...
Attached Images
    
infinite monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 11:59 AM   #995
infinite monkey
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
.
Attached Images
  
infinite monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 05:26 AM   #996
ZenGum
Doctor Wtf
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
Name:  untitled.JPG
Views: 919
Size:  70.1 KB
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008.
Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl.
ZenGum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 07:13 AM   #997
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Ha! Those last few are brilliant.

Particularly like the 'Giving more money to the rich didn't work...' one. It seems to pretty much sum up Adak's economic arguments in the other thread. And most of the conservative pundits I've heard.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 07:03 PM   #998
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Damn ager...
Attached Images
 
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 02:01 PM   #999
Ibby
erika
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh
Ibby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 05:39 PM   #1000
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
Particularly like the 'Giving more money to the rich didn't work...' one. It seems to pretty much sum up Adak's economic arguments in the other thread.
He also ignores history. Jobs were created when the rich were properly taxed. Jobs creation stopped when government gave welfare to the rich. At what point does he first learn history before advancing that myth? Oh. Limbaugh said tax cuts to the rich create jobs. That rhetoric alone proves it.

Ideologues hate facts, numbers, lessons from history, and reality. 'Conservative' principles prove everything. Extremism in the name of liberty is no vice.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 05:02 AM   #1001
ZenGum
Doctor Wtf
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
Please illustrate those points with a funny picture.
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008.
Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl.
ZenGum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 06:43 AM   #1002
ZenGum
Doctor Wtf
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
Name:  915754-binders.jpg
Views: 651
Size:  49.6 KB
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008.
Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl.
ZenGum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 08:44 AM   #1003
infinite monkey
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
^
Attached Images
  
infinite monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 08:51 AM   #1004
infinite monkey
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
.
Attached Images
  
infinite monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 01:03 PM   #1005
Cyber Wolf
As stable as a ring of PU-239
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: On a huge rock covered in water, highly advanced moss and 7 billion parasites
Posts: 1,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
Jobs were created when the rich were properly taxed. Jobs creation stopped when government gave welfare to the rich.
Piggy-backing off this a bit...


So, in essence, if business owners wanted to be richer, they had to make more money. To make more money, they had to grow their business (or sell it at a profit and start another). To grow the business, they had to drum up/better meet demand and increase deliverables while minimizing receivables. To do all that, they need a workforce that will, for whatever reason (as far as they're concerned), come to work everyday and not waste company time/resources. Doing all of this takes time, money and energy. The motivation for doing all this would be the increased ROI. Increased ROI means the business owner gets richer.

If business owners are able to get more R for less I, they will. They definitely will because it's less expenditure. The extra R can come from lots of places, from savings realized by automating a process, from tax breaks, from outside investors being impressed by your latest product. Less expenditure means more money doesn't leave them/the business and they stay rich for longer or get rich sooner. There's no motivation to add more jobs because personal and business profit would be growing without it.

Also, adding more jobs when there isn't more work to be done means you get more work created (to justify paying more workers) and an increase of deliverables, which can mean an increase of receivables (which may or may not cost more money). Increased deliverables still need to be sold and if you saturate the market and the demand isn't there, you drive price down and that can backfire on you (and all your competitors). And they don't want that either. And since a black-inked balance sheet and a graph showing a steady upwards creep on the profit over time axes are the engine of a business, why change it?

And that's just the business side. The consumer side deals with the same situation, with just a slightly different flavor. Both need the other to prosper and when one side is favored the other will suffer. What is a boon to one will make the other go bust. Need balance.
__________________
"I don't see what's so triffic about creating people as people and then getting' upset 'cos they act like people." ~Adam Young, Good Omens

"I don't see why it matters what is written. Not when it's about people. It can always be crossed out." ~Adam Young, Good Omens
Cyber Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.