Countdown to woodchuck rapture

BigV · 05-20-2011, 11:33 AM

What you're reacting to as "funny" is the *combination* of monkeys and feet, and mistaking it for a "funny monkey". If you consider each independently, you'll see that feet are funnier than monkeys. Have you ever seen a monkey with no feet that was funny? No. Even the thought, the image of a monkey with no feet is UNfunny.

But, there are lots of feet without monkeys that are funny. Monty Python's title crushing foot, for example.

05-20-2011, 11:33 AM	#11
BigV Goon Squad Leader Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Seattle Posts: 27,063	What you're reacting to as "funny" is the combination of monkeys and feet, and mistaking it for a "funny monkey". If you consider each independently, you'll see that feet are funnier than monkeys. Have you ever seen a monkey with no feet that was funny? No. Even the thought, the image of a monkey with no feet is UNfunny. But, there are lots of feet without monkeys that are funny. Monty Python's title crushing foot, for example. __________________ Be Just and Fear Not.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)