|
The Internet Web sites, web development, email, chat, bandwidth, the net and society |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-11-2011, 07:58 PM | #76 |
Doctor Wtf
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
|
I'm a bit late but ...
That graph of German energy has some shenanigans in it. It shows separate categories for "hard coal" and "lignite". Lignite is coal. It is also called brown coal or soft coal, as opposed to anthracite/ black coal/ hard coal. It is by far dirtier in terms of CO2 and other pollutants. IMHO, these two should have been given parallel names (either lignite and anthracite, OR brown coal and black coal) and they should have been adjacent on the pie chart. As it is it hides how much energy Germany really got from coal. HOWEVER! Post Fukushima, Germany has decided to phase out all nuclear energy, and replace it with solar. They should be there in 10 years. They have also made big reductions in energy use.
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008. Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl. |
09-11-2011, 08:57 PM | #77 |
To shreds, you say?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet!
Posts: 18,449
|
Obviously Germany's not in it for the hunting. They've gotten soft when it comes to profits over people.
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs |
09-12-2011, 10:18 AM | #78 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
EPA Green Book air quality 1978 - 2010
The EPA Clean Air Act was established in 1974
Non-attainment = failed to mean standard W = whole county P = partial county What happened in 2004 in OH, PA, WV, and many other states ? |
09-12-2011, 02:21 PM | #79 |
Only looks like a disaster tourist
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
|
We've been focused on energy lately, so I thought that this was appropriate. This site shows energy expenditure per capita for 2009 (though without much explanation).
http://energy.gov/maps/2009-energy-expenditure-person Click on the states to get more details. I would have thought that California would be high, and Texas and Wyoming would be low, but that's not the case. It would be helpful to see a breakdown by end-use. |
09-12-2011, 02:57 PM | #80 |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
Well, the biggies for energy use are climate control and transportation, so a rural state, where you have to drive just to get to your mail box, would require more energy use than a city. And a temperate climate like California where you don't need much heating or cooling would be better too. Also, the cost of energy is going to depend on where the energy comes from, and the industry regulations you have in place.
|
09-12-2011, 09:18 PM | #81 |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Yeah, when you pack a lot of people into a small space, your rating on that chart gets better. Even in the areas where Texas has a high population, we're still really spread out. We have no viable/widespread public transportation in any of our cities.
Plus, heating is done by gas in most of the country, but cooling is still generally electric, which is less efficient. And we do way more cooling here than we do heating. |
09-13-2011, 12:05 PM | #82 |
To shreds, you say?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet!
Posts: 18,449
|
Do you use swamp coolers or is it too humid in Texas?
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs |
09-13-2011, 02:07 PM | #83 |
polaroid of perfection
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 24,185
|
YMMV!
__________________
Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac |
09-13-2011, 05:41 PM | #84 | |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Quote:
|
|
09-13-2011, 06:07 PM | #85 | |
To shreds, you say?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet!
Posts: 18,449
|
Quote:
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs |
|
09-14-2011, 12:10 PM | #88 |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
Chesapeake Bay has been having trouble for a long time (decades) with nitrogen rich runoff from farms and suburbs. It causes algea to grow, which kills the fish and shellfish in the Bay. The recent flooding is going to have a huge impact on the Bay. The amount of shit (literally) that has contaminated the Bay this week is remarkable.
Here's a picture from before the flooding. Taken August 23, 2011. Followed by a picture taken yesterday. (Thanks, NASA!) |
09-14-2011, 12:14 PM | #89 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
|
Ugh, glatt. That sucks.
Here is a VERY interesting graph. Discuss amongst yourselves. |
09-14-2011, 12:19 PM | #90 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
|
Since we've been discussing toast I thought this was interesting:
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 29 (0 members and 29 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|