The 'What the fuck!' thread - Page 280

Undertoad · 11-22-2007, 10:26 AM

After reading the BoingBoing comments on the Conservapedia gay topics item, it seems pretty obvious that Conservapedia was "gamed" by bots programmed to reload the articles repeatedly.

11-23-2007, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheldonrs

"hypocritical gay conservatives" are lousy fucks. And usually bottoms who don't move even when you set their pubes on fire.

lol!!!

No different than a Republican with less than ten million in the bank.

Sundae · 11-24-2007, 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkzenrage

No different than a Republican with less than ten million in the bank.

Are they bottoms too then? And enquiring minds wonder how you know

TheMercenary · 11-24-2007, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razzmatazz13

I just don't get art I guess...

Tons more from this artist here
http://paintalicious.org/2007/11/04/...st-ron-english

And here's his website for even more disturbing images

http://popaganda.com/

I love freaky art like that. Thanks for the links.

Razzmatazz13 · 11-25-2007, 02:13 AM

I aim to please

Kumbulu · 11-25-2007, 04:27 AM

I had to find out what sibilant consonants were and now I'm more confused than ever. From Wiki:

A sibilant is a type of fricative or affricate consonant, made by directing a jet of air through a narrow channel in the vocal tract towards the sharp edge of the teeth.

is often taken to be synonymous with the term strident, though this is incorrect - there is variation in usage. The term sibilant tends to have an articulatory or aerodynamic definition involving the production of aperiodic noise at an obstacle. Strident refers to the perceptual quality of intensity as determined by amplitude and frequency characteristics of the resulting sound (i.e. an auditory, or possibly acoustic, definition). Sibilants are louder than their non-sibilant counterparts, and most of their acoustic energy occurs at higher frequencies than non-sibilant fricatives. [s] has the most acoustic strength at around 8,000 Hz, but can reach as high as 10,000 Hz. [ʃ] has the bulk of its acoustic energy at around 4,000 Hz, but can extend up to around 8,000 Hz.
The spin-off terms shibilant, and rarely thibilant, are used to describe particular kinds of sibilant.

But I now have a new favourite word - fricative.

ZenGum · 11-25-2007, 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kumbulu

I had to find out what sibilant consonants were and now I'm more confused than ever. From Wiki:

A sibilant is a type of fricative or affricate consonant, made by directing a jet of air through a narrow channel in the vocal tract towards the sharp edge of the teeth.

is often taken to be synonymous with the term strident, though this is incorrect - there is variation in usage. The term sibilant tends to have an articulatory or aerodynamic definition involving the production of aperiodic noise at an obstacle. Strident refers to the perceptual quality of intensity as determined by amplitude and frequency characteristics of the resulting sound (i.e. an auditory, or possibly acoustic, definition). Sibilants are louder than their non-sibilant counterparts, and most of their acoustic energy occurs at higher frequencies than non-sibilant fricatives. [s] has the most acoustic strength at around 8,000 Hz, but can reach as high as 10,000 Hz. [ʃ] has the bulk of its acoustic energy at around 4,000 Hz, but can extend up to around 8,000 Hz.
The spin-off terms shibilant, and rarely thibilant, are used to describe particular kinds of sibilant.

But I now have a new favourite word - fricative.

He was talking about the letter S and how gay people stereotypically lisp.
My job involves teaching the interdental fricative (TH). zis is hard in a culture where poking ze tongue out is rude

impress · 11-25-2007, 10:45 PM

A hairball removed from a human:

http://edition.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/1...ef=mpstoryview

xoxoxoBruce · 11-25-2007, 11:27 PM

Little late, impress.

John · 11-26-2007, 02:21 PM

glatt · 11-26-2007, 03:48 PM

Wow. That's cool.

So is it multiple exposures of a rotating light that is constantly on, or is is a single long exposure of a rotating strobe light?

BigV · 11-26-2007, 03:50 PM

It's five kerosene lanterns.

Pigeon Point

Previously seen hereabouts... can't remember which thread though. Certainly some A/R dwellar will appear to comfort the poverty of my ignorance, and yours.

glatt · 11-26-2007, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigV

It's five kerosene lanterns.

All you have to do is ask, and somebody around here will usually answer.

xoxoxoBruce · 11-26-2007, 11:23 PM

Five kerosene lanterns and lots of lenses.

John · 11-27-2007, 11:59 AM

11-25-2007, 02:13 AM	#4190
Razzmatazz13 Vicariously, I live... Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: USA Posts: 1,221	I aim to please __________________ I have some people I need to have smoted. ~ SteveDallas

11-25-2007, 04:27 AM	#4191
Kumbulu Kitten Whisperer Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Perth, Western Australia Posts: 49	I had to find out what sibilant consonants were and now I'm more confused than ever. From Wiki: A sibilant is a type of fricative or affricate consonant, made by directing a jet of air through a narrow channel in the vocal tract towards the sharp edge of the teeth. is often taken to be synonymous with the term strident, though this is incorrect - there is variation in usage. The term sibilant tends to have an articulatory or aerodynamic definition involving the production of aperiodic noise at an obstacle. Strident refers to the perceptual quality of intensity as determined by amplitude and frequency characteristics of the resulting sound (i.e. an auditory, or possibly acoustic, definition). Sibilants are louder than their non-sibilant counterparts, and most of their acoustic energy occurs at higher frequencies than non-sibilant fricatives. [s] has the most acoustic strength at around 8,000 Hz, but can reach as high as 10,000 Hz. [ʃ] has the bulk of its acoustic energy at around 4,000 Hz, but can extend up to around 8,000 Hz. The spin-off terms shibilant, and rarely thibilant, are used to describe particular kinds of sibilant. But I now have a new favourite word - fricative. __________________ Bright-tailed & Bushy-eyed.

11-25-2007, 10:45 PM	#4193
impress It's better to be pissed off than pissed on. Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Irvine, California Posts: 936	*A hairball removed from a human:* http://edition.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/1...ef=mpstoryview __________________ If I gave a crap, I'd give it to you.

11-25-2007, 11:27 PM	#4194
xoxoxoBruce The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 71,105	Little late, impress. __________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.

11-26-2007, 03:50 PM	#4197
BigV Goon Squad Leader Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Seattle Posts: 27,063	It's five kerosene lanterns. Pigeon Point Previously seen hereabouts... can't remember which thread though. Certainly some A/R dwellar will appear to comfort the poverty of my ignorance, and yours. __________________ Be Just and Fear Not.

11-22-2007, 10:26 AM	#4186
Undertoad Radical Centrist Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Cottage of Prussia Posts: 31,423	After reading the BoingBoing comments on the Conservapedia gay topics item, it seems pretty obvious that Conservapedia was "gamed" by bots programmed to reload the articles repeatedly.

11-26-2007, 02:21 PM	#4195
John Operations Operative Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 562

11-26-2007, 03:48 PM	#4196
glatt ™ Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Arlington, VA Posts: 27,717	Wow. That's cool. So is it multiple exposures of a rotating light that is constantly on, or is is a single long exposure of a rotating strobe light?

11-26-2007, 11:23 PM	#4199
xoxoxoBruce The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 71,105	Five kerosene lanterns and lots of lenses. __________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.

11-27-2007, 11:59 AM	#4200
John Operations Operative Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 562

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 47 (0 members and 47 guests)