![]() |
|
The Sycamore Manifestos Random Acts of Senseless Coherence |
View Poll Results: Dish or digital cable? | |||
Dish |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 28.57% |
Digital cable |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 14.29% |
Fuck it...stay with basic cable |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 57.14% |
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
|
To dish or not to dish?
This will probably not occur until the end of the summer, but I'm going to throw it out there now while it's on my mind.
I watch quite a bit of TV...and I'm debating whether I should upgrade to the "next" level. Here are the facts: --I am the bitch of Comcast. Comcast is all well and good. The problem is that if I opt for the dish instead of digital cable, I will lose Comcast Sportsnet, which means losing pretty much all the sports teams from here in the area (as all the sports teams' games are on CSN or CN8). --Digital cable is available to me, as well as a dish (as they would install the dish on my balcony railing). --I only have a 19" TV, but I have no real plans to upgrade the TV for a while. Plus, I've seen digital cable on a 19" and it's fine. --All the local channels we currently get are included for an extra $6 a month with DirecTV and Dish Network. --I currently have basic expanded cable (i.e. No premium channels), and it runs about $46 a month for 80 or so channels. Dish Network would run about $50 a month for 150 channels. DirecTV would run $40 a month for over 100 channels. Digital cable would run $60-70 for 200-250 channels. Opinions are much appreciated. Last edited by elSicomoro; 04-27-2002 at 12:25 PM. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|