![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
View Poll Results: What will the Senate make-up be after the election? | |||
Majority Republican |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 66.67% |
Majority Democrat |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Even |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 33.33% |
Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Fresh Incumbent
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
Posts: 28
|
The U.S. Senate
What is your prediction as to the make-up in the U.S. Senate after the upcoming election? Will that be a good thing for our country?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
Republican. No.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Fresh Incumbent
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
Posts: 28
|
Griff, Do you have a number in mind? For instance, 52 rep. 46 Dem 2 independent. Will it be bad because you see more gridlock between congress and Obama? Other reasons?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
I figure Republicans aka "Old People" vote in off year elections. It will lead to a lot of show-boating. They'll keep passing things Obama can't sign and claim he's obstructing the will of the people. Two more years of nonsense punking a weak Presidency. It should lead to a pretty ugly election cycle. I wonder if there could ever be a progressive-libertarian coalition? Superficially we'd dismiss it out of hand but looking at how the two majors will undoubtedly run a BushClinton insider on the same platform of mid-east meddling and banker protection something needs to give.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Not Suspicious, Merely Canadian
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,774
|
In this neck of the woods, I have to agree with Griff - Republicans will turn out to vote in greater numbers than Democrats in an off-year election. I live in a Republican stronghold in spite of it also being economically depressed and a haven for those who need public support.
People in this area feel they're treated contemptuously by Democrats, so even if they need government help, they continue to support a party that doesn't listen to them.
__________________
The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated. - Ghandi ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Fresh Incumbent
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
Posts: 28
|
Very interesting Griff and orthodoc. However, I am still interested in numbers. Any prediction? There are at least two "independents" so that leaves 98 senators.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Fresh Incumbent
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
Posts: 28
|
I know not all 98 senators are up for election, it is usually about a third of them. Some of the estimates I have seen are 52-48 assuming the two independents caucus with the dems.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
The Un-Tuckian
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Central...KY that is
Posts: 39,517
|
Quote:
Crooks, thieves, child molesters, ne'er-do-wells... 100%.
__________________
![]() These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA, EPA, FBI, DEA, CDC, or FDIC. These statements are not intended to diagnose, cause, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. If you feel you have been harmed/offended by, or, disagree with any of the above statements or images, please feel free to fuck right off. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Fresh Incumbent
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
Posts: 28
|
Gravdigr, HaHa. Pretty good. Not sure about the child molester thing though. I think you nailed three out of four.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|