The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2007, 01:24 PM   #1
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Cargo screening

Editorial: Unprotected air cargo International Herald Tribune 09/10/2007
Quote:
The 9/11 Commission warned that terrorists may try to place explosives in the cargo holds of passenger planes and urged that more be done to guard against such attacks. Congress recently passed a good law requiring that all cargo carried on passenger planes be screened, the way carry-on luggage is.

But the Bush administration appears poised to ignore the clear language of the law and allow some shippers to inspect themselves. That would be a lawless move, and it would put air travelers at risk.

The new Democratic-led Congress, keeping a promise to implement the 9/11 Commission recommendations, passed a law to upgrade the lax security in the cargo holds of passenger planes. It requires that air cargo be screened at a level of security "commensurate" with the level of security for screening checked baggage. Congress left the screening method open, but it made clear that there must be an actual search.

Disturbingly, the Transportation Security Administration is talking about allowing sealed boxes sent by approved shippers to be loaded onto passenger planes without being checked. The TSA seems to think it will be able to determine that some shippers are inherently trustworthy. But that makes no more sense than deciding that employees of a particular company can board passenger airplanes with carry-on luggage that has not gone through metal detectors.

The rule has to be: If it goes on a passenger airplane, it gets checked under government supervision.
Considering the hassle they give passengers, I should think they would be a little more concerned with the cargo.
The argument that, when shipping a package you don't know what plane it will go on, seems hollow to me. Isn't the terrorist aim to disrupt the economy rather than targeting individual flights?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 01:29 PM   #2
monster
I hear them call the tide
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perpetual Chaos
Posts: 30,852
I wouldn't have thought it would be that hard for a determined terrorist to get a packet on a specific plane if they studied the assignment procedures etc.

But I think you're right. It wouldn't really matter.
__________________
The most difficult thing is the decision to act, the rest is merely tenacity Amelia Earhart
monster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 03:00 PM   #3
BigV
Goon Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
Send ten packages, or twenty.
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
BigV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 11:18 AM   #4
skysidhe
~~Life is either a daring adventure or nothing.~~
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,828
Even the ships comming into port are not inspected half as much as they are suppose to.

I can't believe homeland security isn't as tough as it should be by now.
skysidhe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.