Mike Rowe

[xoxoxoBruce]

God, I love this guy. From an interview at GOOD.

GOOD: What do you think it means to have a "dirty job," or a job that most people would not want?

MIKE ROWE: Attitudes toward hard work have changed, and not for the better. Many people view dirty jobbers with a mix of pity and derision. Some ignore them altogether. However, one thing is unchanged: People with dirty jobs make civilized life possible for the rest of us. For that reason, I see a willingness to get dirty as a mark of character.

G: Why don’t more people respect dirty jobs?

MR: Once upon a time, we were proud to be dirty. Dirt looked like work, and work was revered. Now, we’ve redefined our notion of what a “good job” looks like. We’ve taken the “dirt” out of the formula, and in the process, marginalized a long list of important professions. Big mistake.

G: How are we going to suffer by demonizing dirt?

MR: Lots of ways. Unpaid student loans, a crumbling infrastructure, a widening skills gap. A third of all skilled tradesmen are north of 50. They’re retiring in record numbers, and no one is there to replace them. We’re not sufficiently gob-smacked by the accomplishments of skilled labor. And so we don’t encourage it. Even as thousands of college graduates return to Mom’s basement, hopelessly in debt and with no prospects in their chosen field. It’s madness.

G: So you’re anti-college?

MR: No. But a four-year degree is not the only way to acquire useful knowledge. Trade schools, apprenticeships, community colleges, on-the-job training, the kind of learning we dismiss as “alternative education,” is every bit as viable as a traditional sheepskin diploma. Maybe more so. And a hell of a lot cheaper. We need to stop promoting one form of education at the expense of another. It’s stupid.

G: Can you prove any of this?

MR: Of course not. I’m the host of a show on cable TV. But reread your first question. In it, you imply that a “dirty job” is another way to describe a “job that most people don’t want.” That implication is widespread. We’ve been gradually training our kids to equate dirt with vocational dissatisfaction. The real enemies of job satisfaction are drudgery and boredom, and those can be found just as readily in cubicles as they can in ditches.

And that, in my opinion, hits the nail smack on the head. It also helps to explain the widening class divide, which has been exploited to help create the political divide.

[Clodfobble]

And the man can sing opera too! :swoon:

[zippyt]

Mike rowe was in Outsidemag , Good read interesting dude ,
I Like his attatude about dirty Jobs , hell I have a Dirty Job !!!

[spudcon]

You can also use your Phd to make more money doing a dirty job than asking people if they want the happy meal. A wise man once said, to become wealthy, find a niche and fill it. There are still tons of dirty jobs out there that need doing, but there are few willing to do them. There are lots of 6th grade graduates out there that buy and sell Phd graduates. These uneducated hire the educated to do their dirty work for them.

[Juniper]

I met his mom a few months ago at a writer's conference. Her name is Peggy. Such a sweet lady, and a good writer too.

In a workshop, guess what she chose to write about? Her son, and how she'd struggled to understand his career choice.

[xoxoxoBruce]

He's been trying to match up people with available jobs, and kids with possible professions, through his website.

But most of all, trying to convince high school kids, that college isn't the be all, end all, it's cracked up to be.

[bbro]

I love him, too. :P

Actually I love the show dirty jobs. I love it the most when the people he is working for give him a hard time. It cracks me up.

[xoxoxoBruce]

We've got to do something different at the primary level, but even this video touts college as the only answer.

[glatt]

The public schools really need to put more emphasis on vocational training.

Vocational training was big when I went to school, and it seems nonexistent around here now.