The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-31-2004, 01:34 PM   #1
wolf
lobber of scimitars
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phila Burbs
Posts: 20,774
Candidate-O-Mat

Okay, that's not what the site is really called ...

But, if you know where you stand on the issues, but aren't sure for whom to vote ... take the test

1. Bush 100%
2. Lieberman 64%
3. Edwards 60%
4. Dean 53%
5. Kerry 52%
6. Clark 49%
7. Sharpton 36%
8. Kucinich 33%
__________________
wolf eht htiw og

"Conspiracies are the norm, not the exception." --G. Edward Griffin The Creature from Jekyll Island

High Priestess of the Church of the Whale Penis
wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2004, 01:58 PM   #2
elSicomoro
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
Oh...fuck...

1. Kucinich 100%
2. Sharpton 99%
3. Dean 94%
4. Kerry 92%
5. Clark 88%
6. Edwards 87%
7. Lieberman 73%
8. Bush 21%
elSicomoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2004, 02:05 PM   #3
elSicomoro
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
Tried it again...ummm...

1. Sharpton 100%
2. Dean 99%
3. Kucinich 99%
4. Kerry 98%
5. Clark 93%
6. Edwards 93%
7. Lieberman 78%
8. Bush 31%
elSicomoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2004, 02:12 PM   #4
Torrere
a real smartass
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,121
Eek.

Kucinich 100%
Sharpton
Dean
Kerry
Clark
Edwards
Lieberman 89%
Bush 32%
Torrere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2004, 02:12 PM   #5
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
1- Bush 100%
2- Lieberman 94%
3- Clark 80%
4- Dean 78%
5- Kerry 78%
6- Edwards 73%
7- Sharpton 67%
8- Kucinich 54%

I understand why it felt that way but its reasoning may be different from mine.

Also they should allow for 10 points of swing either way for character issues.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2004, 02:27 PM   #6
SteveDallas
Your Bartender
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Philly Burbs, PA
Posts: 7,651
Hee hee. It says Bush served in the military!

I came out solidly with a 100% for Sharpton, tho Kucinich and Kerry were in a tie for 2nd at 96%.

Not that it matters at this point.. I'm not sure why Pennsylvania bothers having primaries.
SteveDallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2004, 03:10 PM   #7
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Dean 100
Kerry 90
Edwards 90
Kucinich 82
Bush 82
Lieberman 79

I didn't know that.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2004, 03:13 PM   #8
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Hee hee. It says Bush served in the military!
He most certainly did..er does. Commander in Chief.:p
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2004, 05:18 PM   #9
vsp
Syndrome of a Down
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: West Chester
Posts: 1,367
Kucinich 100%
Kerry 92%
Sharpton 86%
Dean 86%
Clark 83%
Edwards 83%
Lieberman 70%
Bush 03% (No, that's not a typo.)

Dean dropped a few percentage points below Kerry mostly because of his gun stances, where he was mostly "No Opinion" compared to Kerry's "Strongly Favor" on safety devices, background checks and mandatory safety courses/licencing.

I'm surprised Lieberman scored that high, but then again there weren't many religion-themed or culture war-themed questions in the survey.
vsp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2004, 05:19 PM   #10
elSicomoro
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
I feel better now.
elSicomoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2004, 10:04 PM   #11
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
1 Kucinich Score: 100%
2 Sharpton Score: 95%
3 Kerry Score: 92%
4 Dean Score: 87%
5 Clark Score: 86%
6 Edwards Score: 79%
7 Lieberman Score: 74%
8 Bush Score: 5%


Heh. I already knew #1 & #2 were aligned with me on the issues, but they have been out of the race since the start. I'm a bit surprised about how high Kerry is. I would have thought he'd be between Edwards and Lieberman.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2004, 11:50 PM   #12
99 44/100% pure
Infrequently Astonished
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Baltimore metro area
Posts: 324
Kucinich 100
Sharpton 99
Kerry 89
Dean 86
Clark 83
Edwards 77
Lieberman 70

Bush 6 :p


Too bad they didn't have questions such as "How important is it to you that the Commander-in-Chief not be a nutcase?" (Uh, I'm talking about Sharpton.)
__________________
Overcompensating for the 0.56% that is irredeemably corrupted.
99 44/100% pure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2004, 01:52 AM   #13
warch
lurkin old school
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,796
Kucinich 100%
Kerry 96%
Dean 93%
Edwards 83%
Lieberman 73%
Bush 7%

anyone? anyone? I'll take anyone in double digits.
warch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2004, 11:39 AM   #14
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
Going from memory since I was too stunned to post yesterday.
Kucinich
Sharpton
Dean
Lieberman
Clark
Bush
Kerry
Edwards

As always these things are not nuanced enough to be reliable. Hopefully whoever wins has to deal with a Congress controlled by the other party. Bring back the independent prosecutor!
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2004, 03:10 PM   #15
russotto
Professor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,788
This thing is screwed up. I came up with Bush, 100%, when I disagree with at least half of his positions. I think I ended up agreeing only with my anti-environmental and pro-gun stance. Normalizing to 100% is NOT a good idea.

And there needs to be a stronger than "strongly opposed". How about "turns stomach" or "makes me vomit" (e.g. for PATRIOT act or Universal Government-Supervised Healthcare)
russotto is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.