10/2/2004: 777 engine explodes on takeoff [hoax]

Undertoad · 10-02-2004, 11:20 AM

xoxooBruce sends along this one, and sometimes it's best to post the
full-size image cos it's so damn cool. B says:

Boeing 777 on takeoff (no landing flaps) and the engine exploded.
De do dat. The inlet on those engines is 10 ft in diameter and the 777
can take off loaded, on 1 engine. By proving that, the plane increases
the the over water routes it can fly, exponentially. It can fly the same
routes as the 3 and 4 engine planes,

Bullitt · 10-02-2004, 12:50 PM

So did a bird fly into the thing or should I just never fly in a 777 ever again...

Elspode · 10-02-2004, 01:21 PM

So does this picture derive from some sort of extreme certification testing, or is it an actual incident? Either way...it's cool!

Can you imagine looking out the window and seeing that as you took off?

(Captain) "Well, looks like we've had a little engine trouble, and I want to assure you all that we're perfectly safe. However, we will be returning to the terminal to allow all of you to grab a change of underwear."

richlevy · 10-02-2004, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elspode

So does this picture derive from some sort of extreme certification testing, or is it an actual incident? Either way...it's cool!

Can you imagine looking out the window and seeing that as you took off?

(Captain) "Well, looks like we've had a little engine trouble, and I want to assure you all that we're perfectly safe. However, we will be returning to the terminal to allow all of you to grab a change of underwear."

And the really important issue, do they hand out free round trip tickets for canceling the flight or is an engine explosion covered under 'mechanical difficulties'?

BTW, does anyone remember the Batmobile? That's how I described it to my wife.

It's got to be a test, because I can't imagine someone snapping a shot like that without planning it.

Elspode · 10-02-2004, 02:02 PM

I got to thinking, though...if a test, why is it painted up in AA livery? Wouldn't it just be a Boeing scheme?

The Mad Hatter · 10-02-2004, 02:18 PM

I'm wondering about the authenticity.

FloridaDragon · 10-02-2004, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Mad Hatter

I'm wondering about the authenticity.

I googled and could not find an article on it anywhere. I was curious myself as I work for Pratt & Whitney and wondered who's engines were on the plane (a purely self-centered thought I will admit).

FD

GruntDoc · 10-02-2004, 03:32 PM

Unfortunately, it's a photoshop job, and thus not real.

The original, unretouched photo is here:
http://www.airliners.net/discussions...d.main/149498/

Edited to add: Er, fortunately, not unfortunately.

Undertoad · 10-02-2004, 04:27 PM

If xoB weren't financing this operation he would lose IotD privileges for a month.

capnhowdy · 10-02-2004, 05:40 PM

Wrong angle on the exhaust. This retouch needs retouching. Good image though.

xoxoxoBruce · 10-02-2004, 08:19 PM

Awferchristsake, I give up.

I searched every damn place I could think of to check this out to no avail. I’d never heard of the website mentioned (Thanks GruntDoc), it looks like a good resource.
Some of the guys on that website are apparently Photoshop experts and pointed out the errors in the picture that gives it away.

Others were pissed at whoever did this because they’re mocking people about to be killed. That’s wrong.
Even if this is a Photoshop (and not for IotD), this shit does happen and not cause a crash. The 777 can and does fly with one engine. I’d be more concerned about shrapnel coming through the side than loss of power.
FD, the 777-200 uses the P&W 4074 as well as the RR Trent 875 and GE 90-75B.
The 777ER uses P&W4084/4090, RR Trent 884/890 and GE 90-85B/90-90B1/90-92B.
The 777-200ER uses GE 90-110B1.
The 777-300 uses P&W 4090/4098, RR Trent 892, and GE 90-92B.
The 777-300ER uses GE 90-115B.
So anyway, I apologize to UT and the Cellar members for leading you astray on the picture. I suck. But the rest of the information in UT’s post is accurate, so he doesn’t suck.

FloridaDragon · 10-02-2004, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Awferchristsake, I give up.

Don't sweat it xoB! (don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things) Not a bad photoshop so the image was interesting anyway. Many of us at work use a photo of a GE90 blowing up on a test stand as our background and it looks similiar to this event so whoever did it did a decent job.

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

FD, the 777-200 uses the P&W 4074 ...

Could have looked up which engines were on which model easily enough but I primarily work military, not commercial, so the desire was not there

FD

lookout123 · 10-02-2004, 11:39 PM

bruce??? what's happening? that is 2 in one month! i feel my faith being shaken. well maybe not - all is well that ends with me laughing.

wolf · 10-02-2004, 11:55 PM

You would think given where you work, you'd get accurate plane disaster pics from your coworkers ... other people are so unreliable these days ... playing upon Bruce's obviously good and trusting nature ...

Nothing But Net · 10-03-2004, 06:02 AM

The FAA will hear about this:

10-02-2004, 11:20 AM	#1
Undertoad Radical Centrist Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Cottage of Prussia Posts: 31,423	10/2/2004: 777 engine explodes on takeoff [hoax] xoxooBruce sends along this one, and sometimes it's best to post the full-size image cos it's so damn cool. B says: Boeing 777 on takeoff (no landing flaps) and the engine exploded. De do dat. The inlet on those engines is 10 ft in diameter and the 777 can take off loaded, on 1 engine. By proving that, the plane increases the the over water routes it can fly, exponentially. It can fly the same routes as the 3 and 4 engine planes,

10-02-2004, 12:50 PM	#2
Bullitt This is a fully functional babe lair Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Akron, OH Posts: 2,324	So did a bird fly into the thing or should I just never fly in a 777 ever again... __________________ Kiss my white Irish ass.

10-02-2004, 01:21 PM	#3
Elspode When Do I Get Virtual Unreality? Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Raytown, Missouri Posts: 12,719	So does this picture derive from some sort of extreme certification testing, or is it an actual incident? Either way...it's cool! Can you imagine looking out the window and seeing that as you took off? (Captain) "Well, looks like we've had a little engine trouble, and I want to assure you all that we're perfectly safe. However, we will be returning to the terminal to allow all of you to grab a change of underwear." __________________ "To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog

10-02-2004, 02:02 PM	#5
Elspode When Do I Get Virtual Unreality? Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Raytown, Missouri Posts: 12,719	I got to thinking, though...if a test, why is it painted up in AA livery? Wouldn't it just be a Boeing scheme? __________________ "To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog

10-02-2004, 03:32 PM	#8
GruntDoc Provocateur Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Texas Posts: 9	Unfortunately, it's a photoshop job, and thus not real. The original, unretouched photo is here: http://www.airliners.net/discussions...d.main/149498/ Edited to add: Er, fortunately, not unfortunately. Last edited by GruntDoc; 10-02-2004 at 04:38 PM.

10-02-2004, 02:18 PM	#6
The Mad Hatter I'm craaazy! Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pennsylvania Posts: 11	I'm wondering about the authenticity.

10-02-2004, 04:27 PM	#9
Undertoad Radical Centrist Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Cottage of Prussia Posts: 31,423	If xoB weren't financing this operation he would lose IotD privileges for a month.

10-02-2004, 05:40 PM	#10
capnhowdy Blatantly Homosapien Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 6,200	Wrong angle on the exhaust. This retouch needs retouching. Good image though. __________________ Please type slowly. I can't read very fast............... and no holy water, please.

10-02-2004, 08:19 PM	#11
xoxoxoBruce The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 71,105	Awferchristsake, I give up. I searched every damn place I could think of to check this out to no avail. I’d never heard of the website mentioned (Thanks GruntDoc), it looks like a good resource. Some of the guys on that website are apparently Photoshop experts and pointed out the errors in the picture that gives it away. Others were pissed at whoever did this because they’re mocking people about to be killed. That’s wrong. Even if this is a Photoshop (and not for IotD), this shit does happen and not cause a crash. The 777 can and does fly with one engine. I’d be more concerned about shrapnel coming through the side than loss of power. FD, the 777-200 uses the P&W 4074 as well as the RR Trent 875 and GE 90-75B. The 777ER uses P&W4084/4090, RR Trent 884/890 and GE 90-85B/90-90B1/90-92B. The 777-200ER uses GE 90-110B1. The 777-300 uses P&W 4090/4098, RR Trent 892, and GE 90-92B. The 777-300ER uses GE 90-115B. So anyway, I apologize to UT and the Cellar members for leading you astray on the picture. I suck. But the rest of the information in UT’s post is accurate, so he doesn’t suck. __________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.

10-02-2004, 11:39 PM	#13
lookout123 changed his status to single Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Right behind you. No, the other side. Posts: 10,308	bruce??? what's happening? that is 2 in one month! i feel my faith being shaken. well maybe not - all is well that ends with me laughing. __________________ Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin

10-02-2004, 11:55 PM	#14
wolf lobber of scimitars Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Phila Burbs Posts: 20,774	You would think given where you work, you'd get accurate plane disaster pics from your coworkers ... other people are so unreliable these days ... playing upon Bruce's obviously good and trusting nature ... __________________ wolf eht htiw og "Conspiracies are the norm, not the exception." --G. Edward Griffin The Creature from Jekyll Island High Priestess of the Church of the Whale Penis

10-03-2004, 06:02 AM	#15
Nothing But Net Professor Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Spring, Texas Posts: 1,481	For all you sickos coming in here hoping to see an actual plane crash The FAA will hear about this: Attached Images

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)