The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-02-2002, 01:21 AM   #11
jaguar
whig
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,075
Cairo if I remember correctly earlier this year there was allot of blather about this admin finishing the work of bush serious, to which bush sir angrily replied that he had done all he had set out to do - the specific reason for not invading all of Iraq and removing Saddam was that backing Saddam into a corner would be very dangerous and his replacement, or the collapse of Iraq as a nation state would be far worse. I really don't see what's changed since then. I mean when you have serious figures in the military opposed to the war and many republican elders questioning the wisdom of such a move, you really have to wonder don’t you?

Except for an admin desperate to create a concept of a perpetual war against an abstract enemy to allow draconian rule and political maneuvering space, the second coming of McCarthyism. Very interesting Washington post article a couple of days ago about the shadow legal system being created to deal with 'terrorists', all sounds kind of familiar...

Quote:
Saddam ignores fundamental UN Resolutions...
and laws eh? That’s kinda funny. So does the US, at least in diplomatic practice.
__________________
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life.
- Twain
jaguar is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.