It's not just that Wolfowitz exercised questionable activities for the benefit of his 'nappy headed ho'. He also lied repeatedly about doing these things.
Shaha Riza would see her income rise from $130,000 to $244,000 which his $20,000 higher than the maximum for her pay grade. But then having a moral boss can be so profitable.
Wolfowitz Dictated Girlfriend's Pay Deal
World Bank Board Weighs Its Options
Just too many details to summarize anything here. Read the long list of 'moral' decisions from a founding member of Project for a New American Century.
In hip hop, it is acceptable to 'have a ho in every state'. Clearly when a bank president has only one ho in Washington, well, that's good and moral? Same double standard also justified Wolfowitz's lies about Saddam's WMDs. Clearly he is more moral this time because he only had one ho and the bank - not he - paid for her.
04-14-2007, 10:15 AM
Threaded Mode