![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Doctor Wtf
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
|
It's Johnny Goldenboots and 14 mediocre others versus the froggies.
Ok you may now play Spot The Bitter Australian. Really the England forwards were better than the Australian forwards. But I think that kicking for goal leads to dull games, I want to see tries, goal line sieges and desperate tackles. Pah, win a game without scoring a try? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
changed his status to single
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
|
is it possible you all are talking about different things?
if you're talking about football, i just watched arsenal, er i mean France, pick apart the faroe islands to the tune of 6-0. pretty boring. I find it pretty telling on Henry's fitness and his need to get his touch fine tuned that he played the full 90 in a match like this.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Quote:
Now for today we have SA and Argentina! The Pumas have never beaten SA, well but for one time in the 60's when SA toured as a "other than SA side", but forget that. If The Pumas beat SA that would be a real upset. England could surely beat The Pumas, I am not so sure about them beating SA. Kicking alone will not beat the Africans. Thoughts?
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|