Bush's Shrinking Safety Zone

Happy Monkey · 10-25-2007, 12:35 AM

Would there be a point? You wouldn't hear them, any more than you did when you pretended, several times, that the Swift Boaters hadn't been refuted.

Ah, well, what the heck. Here are a few.

1) You yourself impeached her on the issue of evolution.
2) Her much vaunted "footnotes" are full of inaccuracies, misleading representations, incomplete information, and quote mining.
3) She claimed, without source, that "Everyone in Washington knew (Plame) was a CIA agent."

Plus, there are any number of jokes, exaggerations, insinuations, and mudslinging that are both inaccurate and misleading, but can be discounted by supporters as just jokes.

10-25-2007, 12:35 AM	#1
Happy Monkey I think this line's mostly filler. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DC Posts: 13,575	Would there be a point? You wouldn't hear them, any more than you did when you pretended, several times, that the Swift Boaters hadn't been refuted. Ah, well, what the heck. Here are a few. 1) You yourself impeached her on the issue of evolution. 2) Her much vaunted "footnotes" are full of inaccuracies, misleading representations, incomplete information, and quote mining. 3) She claimed, without source, that "Everyone in Washington knew (Plame) was a CIA agent." Plus, there are any number of jokes, exaggerations, insinuations, and mudslinging that are both inaccurate and misleading, but can be discounted by supporters as just jokes. __________________ _________________ \|...............\| We live in the nick of times. \| Len 17, Wid 3 \| \|_______________\| [pics] Last edited by Happy Monkey; 10-25-2007 at 12:41 AM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)