The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-16-2011, 03:42 PM   #11
Fair&Balanced
Operations Operative
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
What does that have to do with the point made?

Tarp was 2008 and has been almost, if not entirely paid back.
TARP was signed into law by Bush in Oct 08 and the funds were almost entirely spent in FY 09 and not recovered until FY 10 and 11. So the outlay was part of the 09 increase in outlay and the income (funds repaid) didnt show up until the next year.

I'm pretty sure it was TARP, along with higher social spending as a result of the first surge of newly unemployed (increased UI, increased SNAP claims, etc) that account for the increased outlays.

The decrease in income is most likely a result of the fact that the Bush 03 tax cut was phased in over five years, with the highest income bracket lowered as the last phase in 2008. So I suspect the 2009 revenue was much lower, because the 2008 returns were the first year that the top bracket paid a 3% lower marginal rate.

But more information is needed.
Fair&Balanced is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.