Lola's foodblog

[xoxoxoBruce]

Looks like one of them fancy places where ya gotta have shoes and stuff.

[Lola Bunny]

Hihi....it was. There was a dress code and everything.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G850A using Tapatalk

[footfootfoot]

Originally Posted by Lola Bunny

It was the office's one year anniversary. She is generous to her employees. She gives us free eye exams and whatever we buy, i.e. glasses, contact lenses, etc., she let us get it at her price. Most places just give their employees discounts. The doc took the whole office to dinner (just 4 of us, plus my sister and her son) and one of the workers is a 300 lbs. (so he claims even though the other girls think he's heavier) man. He ordered an entree that comes with a 10 oz steak, a humongous lobster tail, and mash potatoes. Sundae, I'm sure you would eat less than that.

That might explain why glasses cost $575.

[Lola Bunny]

Originally Posted by footfootfoot

That might explain why glasses cost $575.

No, glasses don't cost $575 because sometimes an optometrist decides to be generous to her employees and treat them to a nice restaurant once a year. In this instance, just this once because we don't know if she'll do that again next year being our office just only celebrated its 1 year anniversary. Glasses can cost up that much whether the doctor decides to share the money with his/her employees are not. I'm just lucky I have a very nice employer who treats her employees well. Actually, she's a very nice lady. When I asked her to help Buster who's a vet, she agreed right away without asking any questions. When a patient seems not have much money, she gives him/her discounts. More and more patients are using vision insurance. Contrary to what many of us may think, the insurance companies don't pay the doctors the difference of the what patients don't pay. Patients pay insurances a premium each month, so they only have to pay a small amount of copay when they go to the optometrist. When the office files a claim for this, we are only reimbursed a fraction of what we charge for services. I am not saying optometrists (doctors) are poor. I'm merely saying they aren't highway robbers. Why are Walmart and etc. places charge less for their glasses? Cheaper frames and lesser quality lens.

[Sundae]

Originally Posted by footfootfoot

That might explain why glasses cost $575.

Originally Posted by Lola Bunny

No, glasses don't cost $575 because sometimes an optometrist decides to be generous to her employees

No, glasses cost $575 because optometrists decide to employ such beautiful petite women that the customers have to buy glasses to check them out properly

[footfootfoot]

Originally Posted by Lola Bunny

No, glasses don't cost $575 because sometimes an optometrist decides to be generous to her employees and treat them to a nice restaurant once a year. In this instance, just this once because we don't know if she'll do that again next year being our office just only celebrated its 1 year anniversary. Glasses can cost up that much whether the doctor decides to share the money with his/her employees are not. I'm just lucky I have a very nice employer who treats her employees well. Actually, she's a very nice lady. When I asked her to help Buster who's a vet, she agreed right away without asking any questions. When a patient seems not have much money, she gives him/her discounts. More and more patients are using vision insurance. Contrary to what many of us may think, the insurance companies don't pay the doctors the difference of the what patients don't pay. Patients pay insurances a premium each month, so they only have to pay a small amount of copay when they go to the optometrist. When the office files a claim for this, we are only reimbursed a fraction of what we charge for services. I am not saying optometrists (doctors) are poor. I'm merely saying they aren't highway robbers. Why are Walmart and etc. places charge less for their glasses? Cheaper frames and lesser quality lens.

OK That was a joke.

The thing I really wonder is: Why does this cost $599, it has image stabilization motors, automatic focus, 13 groups of 17 elements (that's individual lenses) all multi-coated to prevent glare and other optical distortions, all made from the highest quality optical glass, it has a motorized zoom, is sealed against dust, and it is amazingly accurate even after years of handling and operation, but two single lenses made of polycarbonate with a non glare coating, and a frame cost at least $375 online and close to twice that at an optometrist. It's not economy of scale, Canon has just recently only made its 50 millionth lens. It's not just labor. Unless there is a 1000% markup the wholesale cost for the lenses must be astronomical.

A camera lens, significantly more complex, is a luxury and the market won't bear an extraordinary cost. Eyeglasses on the other hand are essential to people who need them and, well, tough shit if you need them and don't have them.

The Luxotica cartel is probably behind this, I'm not blaming optometrists, they are essentially the middlemen, but what would the glasses cost if the lenses were only five bucks?

There are non name brand lenses that are nearly as good as Canons and Nikons- most people can't tell the difference. There are name brand frames and knock offs the relative price difference remains.

[BigV]

One reason is that the camera is the same design, 10,000 times. Glasses are not like that, they're individually fitted, both for frames, which are a balance of cosmetic and functional, and the lenses which are all function, but not necessarily the same from one production unit to the next, unlike the camera.

[Undertoad]

if people taped that canon to their forehead i think they would want it in different colors

designer colors

because we can't pick colors ourselves it is difficult

[sexobon]

Originally Posted by footfootfoot

... Eyeglasses on the other hand are essential to people who need them and, well, tough shit if you need them and don't have them. ...

When you've got them by the eyeballs, their cash and credit will follow.

[Lola Bunny]

Foot: Ahhhh....ok. Didn't mean to be sensitive about it.

We went out to eat after taking my nephew to watch The Minions. The dish was big, so I shared my dish with my sister. We all shared the banana pudding. Blah...who orders banana pudding at a restaurant? My sisters did.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Does the waitstaff ever give you the evil eye for splitting rather than each ordering their own?

[Sundae]

Give Lola the stink-eye? They'd have to be made of stink to do that.
What Lola wants, Lola gets

Sharing dishes over here is considered quite reasonable and normal. But then I suppose tips make up a smaller part of the waiting staff's wages over here, so it's really none of their business how much you order or who eats it.

Mum and I would often share a starter because I had a smaller appetite and she wanted room to finish on a dessert.

[Lola Bunny]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Does the waitstaff ever give you the evil eye for splitting rather than each ordering their own?

No, and they're more than happy to let you do it. Some places will split the entree into two plates for you. However, some places WILL add an extra charge for that. Therefore, I usually ask if they charge extra for splitting the dish. If they say no, then I say okay. Otherwise, I would say, NO NEED! Hehehehe.....But yeah, we just ask for a plain plate and we split it ourselves.

[footfootfoot]

Originally Posted by Sundae

What Lola wants, Lola gets

Damn Yankees made it over there?

[Lola Bunny]

Lunch after movie. Good day.