Sexual history doesn't matter? Who would marry a porn star?

Originally Posted by morethanpretty

I tried to read from the beginning but it started turning foul on the first page. If its all just bmw's rant, then why are so many cellarites paying attention? I say that we all are more intelligent then to be involved in such a pointless petty squabble. Trading insult after insult is really immature and it somewhat dissapoints me that we are so easily captured by bmw's hostile posts. By being so responsive to his posts, we are only encouraging him. For example my brother and I used to have burping contests and when my sis got mad/cried we were only encouraged to burp more, louder and longer. Unfortunatly it has been a long time since my bro and I have had the chance to engage in a serious contest, and I think that I have lost my touch.
That said...
Let me address the question bmw originally psted then:
I would not marry a porn star who is currently working as such, but if they have since left that job, no longer lead a promiscuous life, and respect sex as a demonstration of equal parts emotional love, and physical passion then I would consider them. Of course I would have to find other similarties and love them as a person before I would want to dedicate my love to them. But being a former porn star in of itself is not enough to cause me to disregard them as a partner.

Oh yea is all me. It must be nice to have such selective attention.

[morethanpretty]

Originally Posted by bmwmcaw

Oh yea is all me. It must be nice to have such selective attention.

Originally Posted by morethanpretty

Trading insult after insult is really immature and it somewhat dissapoints me that we are so easily captured

Originally Posted by 9th Engineer

Unfortunately the issue at hand in this thread would be BMW's ranting, he started the damn thing after all...

Self-respect is not so vile a sin as self-neglect.

It appears many people on this board have very selective memories and perceptions. My rantings, and what would you call those insulting and childish retorts by other posters??????

Are those my rantings too? If you care to read carefully it wasn't me that threw the first hand full of mud. I wonder if that really matters now that the gang has decided that intelligence conversation isn't as important as ostracizing posters.

Pray tell sir. Or maybe that point is just to intelligent to address.

Originally Posted by morethanpretty

BMW is such a drama queen. Can we plz just ignore him and get back the issue at hand? Wait...what is that again?

Your another one that likes to take shots at people then cry foul when they throw them back.

Why even mention me just write on the topic. You can't because the opportunity to talk crap and throw insults is what you really want to do.

You get what you give in this world. Don't complain.

[Aliantha]

Gee BM, when I asked if you'd like to be sexualised by men, I didn't realise you'd be so offended.

You should get some help with that, seriously mate. You've got a problem.

[Ibby]

I already answered the thread's question, but I'll do so once more.

By the way, to answer the thread title, yes, yes I would. I dont like the thought of my girlfriend having sex with other people, nor do i like the thought of other people watching, but if she were to decide thats what she wants to do then I would support her, because I love her and it would still be worth it, because I love her for who she IS, not who she does.

[Ibby]

Stop trying to act like a victim and back up your bullshit with something other than bigotry, prejudice, and sexism.

Oh yeah, and just for good measure...
Fuckin' homophobe.

[Ibby]

Still ignoring me, bmwmcaw?

[Ibby]

I can't even think of one species of plant or animal on this wide earth that engages in homosexual acts on a regular base, if at all.

Dolphins, for one.

In fact, most species show signs of homosexuality. Do some research if youre going to try to use science and logic to defend your bigotry.

...And 'not how theyre supposed to be used' according to who, exactly?

[Trilby]

Loads of animals are homosexual.

Ah. guess you've been too busy to watch the DiscoveryChannel, eh? well, no matter. I'm sure your school of...whatever...has many, MANY followers...really hope none of them turn out to be Gay, though.

[Elspode]

Remind me again *who* decided how I am supposed to use *my* parts? Don't *I* get to decide? They are, after all, mine.

I'm guessing it wasn't Nature, since my parts do, indeed, fit in places where they were, according to you, never intended to go. So...continue to enlighten me as to why sodomy is bad. And reproduction doesn't count, because I don't engage in sex for reproduction anymore.

[Undertoad]

Evolutionary biologists speculate that there may have been an evolutionary advantage to tribes with a certain number of adults disinclined to breed. This could have regulated the rate of reproduction, provided a different ratio of children to adults, provided a different atmosphere and culture. It also would have provided a natural lead for the person to decide on the color scheme of the cave, what should be painted on the walls, making sure that the skulls of the dead are lined up nicely in order of height, etc.

This goes well with the recent finding that there are more gays amongst the population of younger brothers of brothers. In a tribe with many male births, there is less need for more breeding competition amongst the males.

It really hurts your argument, bm, to draw it to your own conclusion that maybe there will arrive a time when there won't be a huge number of guys chasing the hot poon. It is to laugh. And if they all do catch teh ghey, what's your problem? Are you worried they'll convert you too? Are you worried they'll all want to fuck you up the ass? Doesn't it just mean there'll be more women left over, willing to be dominated by you?

[Elspode]

I'm going to go out on a limb here and take a wild guess that Evolutionary arguments are probably disallowed with our pal, much the same as religious arguments are disallowed by my thinking.

Originally Posted by Undertoad

Evolutionary biologists speculate that there may have been an evolutionary advantage to tribes with a certain number of adults disinclined to breed. This could have regulated the rate of reproduction, provided a different ratio of children to adults, provided a different atmosphere and culture. It also would have provided a natural lead for the person to decide on the color scheme of the cave, what should be painted on the walls, making sure that the skulls of the dead are lined up nicely in order of height, etc.

This goes well with the recent finding that there are more gays amongst the population of younger brothers of brothers. In a tribe with many male births, there is less need for more breeding competition amongst the males.

It really hurts your argument, bm, to draw it to your own conclusion that maybe there will arrive a time when there won't be a huge number of guys chasing the hot poon. It is to laugh. And if they all do catch teh ghey, what's your problem? Are you worried they'll convert you too? Are you worried they'll all want to fuck you up the ass? Doesn't it just mean there'll be more women left over, willing to be dominated by you?

There is what we believe and then there is what we know. Theories, speculation, and hypothesis are well and fine but you need only look through your own eyes at the world around you. I am not an evolutionary biologist nor was I a witness to 2 million years of planetary social and biological evolution. But what I can see and can prove right now is that life is perpetuated by life forms within a species of the opposite sex. Evolutionary biology is one of many scientific disciplines that study this area.

You want to massage the issues around the edges, well, have a ball. It doesn't change the natural order that exist on this planet right here, right now.


Your statement regarding my so called fears of homosexuals and theories of repression is nothing more than a signal of retreat from the conversation. I’ve said it before, playing the homophobic, race card, or women hater is a control tactic deployed when a more thoughtful redress on the topic can’t be made. I am thoroughly not impressed. It’s precisely these kinds of retorts that many of the “gang” can’t seem to maintain some sense of self-control over themselves. When you can’t respond intelligently you resort to insults and disparaging comments.

You asked me whatI based my postion on and what an abomination was and I told you. Reread you response and tell me if your comments enlarged or diminished the conversation.

[Happy Monkey]

Originally Posted by bmwmcaw

But what I can see and can prove right now is that life is perpetuated by life forms within a species of the opposite sex. Evolutionary biology is one of many scientific disciplines that study this area.

I can see and prove right now that life is also perpetuated by creatures that never reproduce, if they assist ones that do in any way. A gay caveman can hunt and gather for the tribe, and protect and care for the children of the tribe. And if the youngest of a set of brothers is gay, he can expect that his genes will be passed on by his older brothers anyway.