"She", not "he", guys

[JBKlyde]

I think I saw that picture on TMZ...

[JBKlyde]

The sheer fact that a homo thread gets more attention than one speaking of sound minds goes to show that the level of sanity and morality on this entire bullitian board is least to say "poor."

[DanaC]

Originally Posted by JBKlyde

The sheer fact that a homo thread gets more attention than one speaking of sound minds goes to show that the level of sanity and morality on this entire bullitian board is least to say "poor."

Pipe down, prick.

[Gravdigr]

From now on, I'd like to be known as Big Dick Blaque.

Because it's a 100% accurate description.

Video clip NSFW

[Aliantha]

Originally Posted by henry quirk

*that Ibram self-defines as 'girl' is fine by me; that he believes any one else is obligated to address him as a girl (for no other reason than because he wants it that way) is absurd.

Just a note on this statement.

It's rather contradictory. If you think it's fine that Ibram defines as a girl, then I don't see where there's any absurdity in recognising her wishes, ie what difference does it make to you, and if there's none, then why not simply do as a person asks instead of making it an issue?

[DanaC]

So, Infi. I take it you agree with Henry's assertions regarding Ib's self definition then?

[infinite monkey]

I agree with henry's assertion about ibs calling jbk a sick twisted fuck. How can you take anything else from my post?

And so, in the spirit of the day, I took the moment to communicate my increasing intolerance for drax and his new moral high ground, albeit with what must be supposed to be amusing name play like Mr Hanky.

[DanaC]

I didn't take it from your post so much as the fact you seemed to be jumping on John for attempting to supprt Ibs.

Clearly I misread your intent :p

[DanaC]

You do seem to be almost pleased to see Ibs 'get some' though. Again maybe I am misreading the situation. But I think in another context you'd probably be appalled by what henry is saying in much of this thread.

[infinite monkey]

Originally Posted by DanaC

You do seem to be almost pleased to see Ibs 'get some' though. Again maybe I am misreading the situation. But I think in another context you'd probably be appalled by what henry is saying in much of this thread.

I expect it's much the same as the pleasure I perceive some to feel when they get to point out others' moral ineptitude.

[infinite monkey]

I don't care for john yet. Perhaps the new and improved one will grow on me.

As to ibs, I really don't know. This is new subject matter for me. This is why I stated earlier that understanding would better come from explanation and discussion rather than reaction and name-calling. I get a bit turned away when someone scolds me like I'm a child for not making the conscious decision to start calling someone I've known as a 'he' for years a 'she.' I might be confused and trying to understand, but admonishing me for not getting immediately with the program isn't going to turn my head.

[John Sellers]

Originally Posted by infinite monkey

I don't care for John yet. Perhaps the new and improved one will grow on me.

Frankly, I don't care if anyone here likes me. Ima be me.

[DanaC]

Oh I get that. I do. And I agree with a lot of posters that Ibs needs to grow a thicker skin and be less preachy. But...

Giving Klyde a free pass when he is throwing the word 'homo' into every other post and generally conducting an anti-homosexual crusade in the cellar doesn't seem a good response to me. I'm not suggesting we all round on Klyde. But if he keeps pricking at Ibs and Ibs pricks back, maybe we dont all leap on Ibs in response.

Nor do I think it's fair to all wade in if another poster decides he's going to tear into Ib's sense of self in such a crass and demeaning manner as this thread.

That's as much as I am going to say about this now. I find it all really grim.

[Lamplighter]

Originally Posted by DanaC

<snip>
Nor do I think it's fair to all wade in if another poster decides he's going to
tear into Ib's sense of self in such a crass and demeaning manner as this thread.

That's as much as I am going to say about this now.I find it all really grim.

I agree completely.

This thread should have been closed at Posts #2 and 3
It wasn't, so Henry Quick wins my award as "Troll of 2012".

[regular.joe]

Originally Posted by Lamplighter

I agree completely.

This thread should have been closed at Posts #2 and 3
It wasn't, so Henry Quick wins my award as "Troll of 2012".

Vote number 2 in favor of Henry Quirk as "Troll of 2012". Still a long way to go on the year, he may out do himself, or another semi dweller may up the ante before Xmas. I reserve the right to vote again later in the year.