Sexual history doesn't matter? Who would marry a porn star? - Page 14

Stormieweather · 11-07-2006, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmwmcaw

If you want to engage in a conversation then making silly and non-sense points isn't going to be productive. ~snip~ I not even going to address those idiotic remarks.

That's ok. I was being as serious as your homophobic, unfactual, ridiculous comments warranted. :p

Stormie

Happy Monkey · 11-07-2006, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmwmcaw

Somebody still has to have babies for that imaginary gay caveman to role play,

His community. Gays don't stop anyone from having babies, and they can help other people's babies survive.

Aliantha · 11-07-2006, 05:42 PM

Gay boys have poo babies! I can't believe you're all so uneducated!!! (heard that term from a tranny, so don't think I'm being phobic or anything)

What about hermaphrodites anyway?

There's lots of fish and reptile hermaphrodites...oh, and people, made by God (if you believe that train of thought). What about them? Which bits should they use and what for?

Ibby · 11-07-2006, 07:25 PM

I call BS on your 'playing the homophobia card is backing out' thing... because you are little better than a Klansman if you are homophobic, which you are, and so there is no use in arguing the merits of homosexuality with you.

Aliantha · 11-07-2006, 07:43 PM

Sssshh...don't get him started on the Klan. I'd bet money on him being a card carrying member.

And I'm not even joking! Those people are fairly fond of the word 'abomination' you know.

9th Engineer · 11-07-2006, 09:31 PM

Almost all of the time the homophobe card IS a backing out of the conversation. There's no real to continue afterward other than "am not. Are too". The term has a meaning, but remember that it refers to a FEAR of gays.
(Sorry, I HATE when people start using that term)

Ibby · 11-08-2006, 01:18 AM

Technically speaking it means fear of gays, but in use and practice it more effectively means the same thing as racist or sexist. Gayist just doesnt have the right ring to it.

John Adams · 11-08-2006, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmwmcaw

Ok, I'll try an answer your failure to understand this way; Life begins at conception, life is perpetuated by members of the same species through copulation between opposite of their respective sexes. I can't even think of one species of plant or animal on this wide earth that engages in homosexual acts on a regular base, if at all.

The gay penguin article:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4352011/
Quick google search reveals lots more.

As far as homosexuality who cares. If they keep it private it doesn't matter to me what their preference is, of course that applies equally to heterosexuals. I don't need your preference shoved in my face.

As far as the original question, sure I would marry a porn star, of course I would require she be out of the business first and free from disease. BUt who cares, that was the past, sex is sex and love is much more.

Ibby · 11-08-2006, 06:01 AM

Amen, mate.

yesman065 · 11-08-2006, 07:26 AM

BM - I have never been shocked that you have personally attacked me - NEVER. Its all you are here to do and I was the first one to offer AND substantiate an opposing position while removing virtually all of your bogus "facts and/or corroborating evidence." You then went personal. At this point, it is quite obvious to everyone, except perhaps you, that your statements have very little, if any basis at all outside your mind. I have asked you repeatedly to back up what you said and as expected you were unable to do so. As far as I'm concerned - you have nothing to add of any value and I will no longer participate in your meaningless rantings other than to defend myself and expose your BS.

11-08-2006, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stormieweather

That's ok. I was being as serious as your homophobic, unfactual, ridiculous comments warranted. :p

Stormie

11-08-2006, 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yesman065

BM - I have never been shocked that you have personally attacked me - NEVER. Its all you are here to do and I was the first one to offer AND substantiate an opposing position while removing virtually all of your bogus "facts and/or corroborating evidence." You then went personal. At this point, it is quite obvious to everyone, except perhaps you, that your statements have very little, if any basis at all outside your mind. I have asked you repeatedly to back up what you said and as expected you were unable to do so. As far as I'm concerned - you have nothing to add of any value and I will no longer participate in your meaningless rantings other than to defend myself and expose your BS.

11-08-2006, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Adams

The gay penguin article:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4352011/
Quick google search reveals lots more.

As far as homosexuality who cares. If they keep it private it doesn't matter to me what their preference is, of course that applies equally to heterosexuals. I don't need your preference shoved in my face.

As far as the original question, sure I would marry a porn star, of course I would require she be out of the business first and free from disease. BUt who cares, that was the past, sex is sex and love is much more.

11-08-2006, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9th Engineer

Almost all of the time the homophobe card IS a backing out of the conversation. There's no real to continue afterward other than "am not. Are too". The term has a meaning, but remember that it refers to a FEAR of gays.
(Sorry, I HATE when people start using that term)

11-08-2006, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aliantha

Sssshh...don't get him started on the Klan. I'd bet money on him being a card carrying member.

And I'm not even joking! Those people are fairly fond of the word 'abomination' you know.

11-07-2006, 05:42 PM	#198
Aliantha trying hard to be a better person Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Brisbane, Australia Posts: 16,493	Gay boys have poo babies! I can't believe you're all so uneducated!!! (heard that term from a tranny, so don't think I'm being phobic or anything) What about hermaphrodites anyway? There's lots of fish and reptile hermaphrodites...oh, and people, made by God (if you believe that train of thought). What about them? Which bits should they use and what for? __________________ Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber

11-07-2006, 07:25 PM	#199
Ibby erika Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: "the high up north" Posts: 6,127	I call BS on your 'playing the homophobia card is backing out' thing... because you are little better than a Klansman if you are homophobic, which you are, and so there is no use in arguing the merits of homosexuality with you. __________________ not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh

11-07-2006, 07:43 PM	#200
Aliantha trying hard to be a better person Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Brisbane, Australia Posts: 16,493	Sssshh...don't get him started on the Klan. I'd bet money on him being a card carrying member. And I'm not even joking! Those people are fairly fond of the word 'abomination' you know. __________________ Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber

11-07-2006, 09:31 PM	#201
9th Engineer Bioengineer and aspiring lawer Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Pittsburgh Posts: 872	Almost all of the time the homophobe card IS a backing out of the conversation. There's no real to continue afterward other than "am not. Are too". The term has a meaning, but remember that it refers to a FEAR of gays. (Sorry, I HATE when people start using that term) __________________ The most valuable renewable resource is stupidity.

11-08-2006, 01:18 AM	#202
Ibby erika Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: "the high up north" Posts: 6,127	Technically speaking it means fear of gays, but in use and practice it more effectively means the same thing as racist or sexist. Gayist just doesnt have the right ring to it. __________________ not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh

11-08-2006, 06:01 AM	#204
Ibby erika Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: "the high up north" Posts: 6,127	Amen, mate. __________________ not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh

11-08-2006, 07:26 AM	#205
yesman065 Banned - Self Imposed Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,847	BM - I have never been shocked that you have personally attacked me - NEVER. Its all you are here to do and I was the first one to offer AND substantiate an opposing position while removing virtually all of your bogus "facts and/or corroborating evidence." You then went personal. At this point, it is quite obvious to everyone, except perhaps you, that your statements have very little, if any basis at all outside your mind. I have asked you repeatedly to back up what you said and as expected you were unable to do so. As far as I'm concerned - you have nothing to add of any value and I will no longer participate in your meaningless rantings other than to defend myself and expose your BS.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)