![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
I recall a new tire design from Michelin that did not use air. A prototype was demonstrated. That meant the tire would never be marketed. Eventually its faults were reported - too much vibration. If biofuel was viable, then it would not be reported. Boeing is simply doing what any engineering company would do. Look at everything. If they see something worthy, then the Seattle Times will not report it until it is ready for market. But such stories are good for those who judge by emotion. "Boeing is an environmentally friendly company. They use pond scum." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Banned - Self Imposed
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
|
Biofuels already exist. They refining processes are constantly being updated and improved. It is more a question of when at this point - not if. Do a simple google search before preaching outdated nothingness.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Quote:
Your assumption that it came from a press release shows you don't understand the relationship between Boeing and the Seattle Times. The Times is constantly publishing in depth reports about Boeing, without permission or help from the company, often to Boeing's chagrin. Boeing doesn't manufacture the engines, which would be the primary consideration for any move to biofuels. They do, however, have to consider the fuel storage and handling. This would be especially true of Boeing Business jets that compete with Embraer. Boeing also frequently funds, and lends technical support, to start-ups that would enhance/support the airline industry.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|