Zeitgeist - Page 3

Cicero · 05-24-2008, 02:56 PM

Well I guess you put him in his place then. Well done.

Brav-the fuck-o! Fabulous.

The topic starter is probably gone permanently so I'm done with this thread.

Sundae · 05-25-2008, 01:16 PM

I have explained that my problem was with the film.
I have watched the film, and detailed exactly why I think it is ridiculous.
I have further explained that I do not have a problem with WHIP personally, but that anyone who espouses such opinions (especially against a foreign country) is fair game in my eyes.

WHIP has never been chased off a thread in this forum in his life. There were people offering to meet him and beat him up in other threads - a difference of opinion from a women half a world away does not threaten him. And you know what, if someone else comes on here saying the same things that were stated as fact in the film, I will have the same reaction. Maybe I'm wrong, but in which case it's up to other Dwellars to offer them the red carpet - if I am a lone voice in the wilderness denying the 9/11 conspiracy then I will work it out eventually and leave because this isn't the place I thought it was.

You've done nothing but make personal comments about me and my opinions. Brav-the-fuck-o.
Watch the fucking film and make a fucking informed comment on it or shut the fuck up you rude fuck.
There. Talking your fucking language now?

W.HI.P · 05-25-2008, 01:46 PM

What I found most interesting about this film, is its presentation of the economical situation in the USA.

Sundae · 05-25-2008, 02:18 PM

WHIP I'm pretty sure almost all the Americans here would disagree with most of the conclusions reached, even if they accepted the historical facts (many of which I believe are skewed to reach said conclusions). Surely you don't believe that in the next 10-30 years the US will form a single ecomonic entity with Canada and Mexico to the extent of having a single currency? I mean how could it possibly be in both nation's interests to take Mexico on board?

Clodfobble · 05-25-2008, 03:38 PM

And I'd venture to say most Canadians wouldn't want to be associated with us, either. (Hell, Quebec doesn't even want to be associated with the rest of Canada.)

W.HI.P · 05-26-2008, 01:00 PM

No, of course not Sundae Girl.

I fear that in 10-30 years from now, based on the economical reality in the USA, combined with the USA's relationship's with the powers that rule the world today, looks very Grim.
Canada will not attach itself to a sinking ship.

This whole Quebecois topic, again is based on the USA.
Quebec wanted no part in Canada's aliance with the USA.
In the end the Quebecois won out, as there will be no colaboration apart from renting out parts of Alberta.

The Liberals and the Bloc still have the majority of seats, and that will simply increase in the next elections.
The French run this country.

I've still seen no feed-back in this thread regarding the economical situation in the USA.
A situation forseen by G.Washington and T.Jefferson.

Cicero · 05-26-2008, 01:08 PM

It's called the North American Union, and you guys already have the European Union that installed the Euro dollar. It isn't hard to believe. And no, I haven't seen it yet.
(Zeitgeist)

So far the North American Union is just a theory fashioned after the European Union, but the CFA seems to be backing it, along with Bush, and some wild professor.
The reason to install it would be to create these ease of access highways to import and export our great commodities, and cheaper work force, legally. Along with the national id that would contain rfid tags. Chip implants and such is not a conspiracy as they are already installed over here.....

I know there are lots of ideas, and am not sure how much of these ideas are conspiracy or just theories, but I do know the ideas of "conspiracy theorists" have already occured in some cases, and in some cases not.

Here is the published CFA document.
http://www.cfr.org/content/publicati...a_TF_final.pdf

The NAU is just a theory thus far, but there are some pretty heavy advocates, which is worrisome. All theories are not conspiracies. And vice versa.

Oh and sundae fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck. And fuck. You stfu, you were damned rude. You can dish it out but can't take it...The next time I see someone "baby" you, I am going to laugh my ass off. Which is probably going to be, in 5-4-3-2-.......

Just admit you were being rude. Admit iiiit!!!! lol!

05-24-2008, 02:56 PM	#31
Cicero Looking forward to open mic night. Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: New Mexico Posts: 5,148	Well I guess you put him in his place then. Well done. Brav-the fuck-o! Fabulous. The topic starter is probably gone permanently so I'm done with this thread. __________________ Show me a sane man, and I will cure him for you.- Carl Jung

05-25-2008, 01:16 PM	#32
Sundae polaroid of perfection Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 24,185	I have explained that my problem was with the film. I have watched the film, and detailed exactly why I think it is ridiculous. I have further explained that I do not have a problem with WHIP personally, but that anyone who espouses such opinions (especially against a foreign country) is fair game in my eyes. WHIP has never been chased off a thread in this forum in his life. There were people offering to meet him and beat him up in other threads - a difference of opinion from a women half a world away does not threaten him. And you know what, if someone else comes on here saying the same things that were stated as fact in the film, I will have the same reaction. Maybe I'm wrong, but in which case it's up to other Dwellars to offer them the red carpet - if I am a lone voice in the wilderness denying the 9/11 conspiracy then I will work it out eventually and leave because this isn't the place I thought it was. You've done nothing but make personal comments about me and my opinions. Brav-the-fuck-o. Watch the fucking film and make a fucking informed comment on it or shut the fuck up you rude fuck. There. Talking your fucking language now? __________________ Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac Last edited by Sundae; 05-25-2008 at 01:32 PM. Reason: spelling

05-25-2008, 01:46 PM	#33
W.HI.P Free Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 1,513	What I found most interesting about this film, is its presentation of the economical situation in the USA. __________________ pls stfu k thx

05-25-2008, 02:18 PM	#34
Sundae polaroid of perfection Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 24,185	WHIP I'm pretty sure almost all the Americans here would disagree with most of the conclusions reached, even if they accepted the historical facts (many of which I believe are skewed to reach said conclusions). Surely you don't believe that in the next 10-30 years the US will form a single ecomonic entity with Canada and Mexico to the extent of having a single currency? I mean how could it possibly be in both nation's interests to take Mexico on board? __________________ Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac

05-26-2008, 01:00 PM	#36
W.HI.P Free Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 1,513	No, of course not Sundae Girl. I fear that in 10-30 years from now, based on the economical reality in the USA, combined with the USA's relationship's with the powers that rule the world today, looks very Grim. Canada will not attach itself to a sinking ship. This whole Quebecois topic, again is based on the USA. Quebec wanted no part in Canada's aliance with the USA. In the end the Quebecois won out, as there will be no colaboration apart from renting out parts of Alberta. The Liberals and the Bloc still have the majority of seats, and that will simply increase in the next elections. The French run this country. I've still seen no feed-back in this thread regarding the economical situation in the USA. A situation forseen by G.Washington and T.Jefferson. __________________ pls stfu k thx

05-25-2008, 03:38 PM	#35
Clodfobble UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 20,012	And I'd venture to say most Canadians wouldn't want to be associated with us, either. (Hell, Quebec doesn't even want to be associated with the rest of Canada.)

05-26-2008, 01:08 PM	#37
Cicero Looking forward to open mic night. Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: New Mexico Posts: 5,148	It's called the North American Union, and you guys already have the European Union that installed the Euro dollar. It isn't hard to believe. And no, I haven't seen it yet. (Zeitgeist) So far the North American Union is just a theory fashioned after the European Union, but the CFA seems to be backing it, along with Bush, and some wild professor. The reason to install it would be to create these ease of access highways to import and export our great commodities, and cheaper work force, legally. Along with the national id that would contain rfid tags. Chip implants and such is not a conspiracy as they are already installed over here..... I know there are lots of ideas, and am not sure how much of these ideas are conspiracy or just theories, but I do know the ideas of "conspiracy theorists" have already occured in some cases, and in some cases not. Here is the published CFA document. http://www.cfr.org/content/publicati...a_TF_final.pdf The NAU is just a theory thus far, but there are some pretty heavy advocates, which is worrisome. All theories are not conspiracies. And vice versa. Oh and sundae fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck. And fuck. You stfu, you were damned rude. You can dish it out but can't take it...The next time I see someone "baby" you, I am going to laugh my ass off. Which is probably going to be, in 5-4-3-2-....... Just admit you were being rude. Admit iiiit!!!! lol! __________________ Show me a sane man, and I will cure him for you.- Carl Jung Last edited by Cicero; 05-26-2008 at 01:38 PM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)