![]() |
|
Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,360
|
Grammar question
Heya, I'd like your opinion on this:
I'm reviewing a brief right now, and there are several sentences with this construction: "The only evidence were the affidavits." Now, to me, that's incorrect agreement between the subject and verb. If "evidence" is the subject, then it should read, "The only evidence was the affidavits." But that sounds wrong. Maybe "evidence" is a collective noun? Maybe the verb "to be" is reflexive and is messing me up. If you reverse it, to say "The affidavits were the only evidence" that sounds better, and I could reword it. But I was always taught that the sentence construction should be the same either way (subject first, or object first, you still have to have agreement.)
__________________
"Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards!" |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|