![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#46 |
-◊|≡·∙■·∙≡|◊-
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Parts unknown.
Posts: 4,081
|
I see a waterfall and a canoe with no paddles.
![]()
__________________
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
whig
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,075
|
Well on my British passport I'd still have to have fingerprints taken. That isn't my idea of friendly to a nation that's given more support than anyone to the US's War on Whatever.
I've never exactly been a big fan of the US but I wouldn't consider travel there until I can enter without being treated like a convicted criminal and I know plenty of others like me. I also know a growing group of people refusing work in the US because of the increasingly ridiculous legal system coupled with these new ludicrous feelgood^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H security measures.
__________________
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life. - Twain |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Well guys, it looks like our measures were successful.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Junior Master Dwellar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kingdom of Atlantia
Posts: 2,979
|
Personally, I don't see anything wrong with fingerprinting foreign nationals. If they are here on legitimate business, I don't understand the resistance. It makes it one step harder for people who are faking passports to do so. I think that's a good idea.
IMO, I prefer the increased "security measures" such as fingerprints on passports, because we got complacent before, and it bit us on the ass. Now, when we try to increase security, people complain. So what, we're suppose to be complacent again? Don't think so. Well, then complain. We don't need you over here complaining anyway. Stay home and complain. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
I hope the terrorists don't stroll in from Mexico or Canada.
![]()
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
It is not the fingerprinting that created the problem. It was a sudden demand for microchips in passports. The proclaimation was made without even first learning what could and could not be done - classic MBA type solutions. This caused a massive problem for our friends who had to stand for hours in lines for Visas - because this computer chip passport could not be implemented by Oct 2004. It is only recently that Powell finally recinded the requirement. But why the requirement? The US government did not have an information collecting problem. They had and probably still have an information processing problem. Problem was not with the existing passport system. WTC attack could occur becasue little people were stifled by top management from doing their job. The list is long from John O'Neill, Richard Clarke, FBI agents in AZ, IL, and MN - and onwards. And so we fix a defective top management problem by creating a big computer chip passport system? Why no terrorists lately? Top management decided that maybe terrorism was a problem. Suddenly little people were empowered to do their job. Problem even traceable to a president who had at least three warnings specifically about the WTC attack - and did nothing. Problem being that this administration even tried to hide those warnings rather than admit to the reason why WTC attackers were never detected. A computer passport is cute. But it does not solve the original problem - top management who could not even be bothered to respond to obvious warnings. Even after Al Qaeda tried to use commercial airliners as missiles to attack the Eiffel Tower years previous (a concept even demonstrated in a Tom Clancey novel), Condi Rice claims she could never forsee terrorists using aircraft as missiles. Therein lies the problem. Top management even in denial. High tech passports only a knee jerk solution that does not address the original problem. Blame the foreigners. Its all their fault. We don't need no stickin National ID system. Driver's Licenses do just fine. We don't need no president that listens to warnings. Don't worry. Be happy. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Junior Master Dwellar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kingdom of Atlantia
Posts: 2,979
|
mhm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
King Of Wishful Thinking
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 6,669
|
Quote:
The fact is, many companies and government offices no longer hire their own cleaning staffs. In many cases they are contractors, sub-contracters, or sub-sub-contractors. Since illegal aliens work cheaper, there is already an environment of avoiding documentation and background checks. Can anyone really tell a work crew of Salvadorans from one made up of ethnic Saudis?
__________________
Exercise your rights and remember your obligations - VOTE!I have always believed that hope is that stubborn thing inside us that insists, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us so long as we have the courage to keep reaching, to keep working, to keep fighting. -- Barack Hussein Obama |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
|
Nah...they all look the same...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Professor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,788
|
The biometric requirement, which is where the microchips come in, has not been rescinded. But it only applies to NEWLY-ISSUED passports after October 26, 2004.
The machine-readable passport simply uses OCR fonts in a specific location. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Can anyone really tell a work crew of Salvadorans from one made up of ethnic Saudis?
Most of us in Texas can. On the other hand, I am shocked when people can tell Korean, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, Taiwanese, and Thai people apart just by looking at them. It's all in what you're used to seeing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
It had long been acknowledged as one path into the US. Escape from a refugee camp only just one-half mile from the Chunnel. Walk under the channel. Get a plane from Britian to Canada - no passport was required. Cross any land border between US and Canada.
Since then, we have made this path more difficult - requiring forged documents to use that airplane. The point is that immigration controls are only a filter, as border guard Debra demonstrated. After being warned by the Clinton administration that acutally took threats seriously, Debra then identified and ran down what would be the Los Angles airport bomber. Filter not only work here but identified a long list of bombing that included Toronto, the NYC Millenium celebration, the (was it?) Hilton hotel in Amman Jordan, and other bombings. The one bombing that Debra did not end up stopping was the USS The Sullivans. Terrorists so overloaded their boat with bombs that the boat sunk. The system works when the president first takes warnings seriously. The system does not work when the president sounds five Orange alerts on threats that just did not exist but were timed to mask his other blunders; to shore up a falling popularity in polls. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|