![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Quote:
One of my children has/had obvious gut pain. The other does not seem to, but I can't ask her because she doesn't talk. (Some autism mothers have also reported that their older children, even once they learned to talk, didn't tell anyone about their moderate levels of pain until much later because at some point they had decided it was normal, that everyone felt this way.) Both have neurological symptoms beyond the pain, which we are working to address through other known causes. It is possible we will never know all the causes of the neurological damage; or that we will, but be unable to totally repair the damage; or that we can repair it, but will only be able to maintain that level with a steady dose of drugs and supplements to address permanent underlying disorders. I don't know. The only thing I fundamentally do not believe is that this is a wholly genetic condition that they were born with from day one. The neurons were working, and then they stopped working. Last edited by Clodfobble; 12-10-2009 at 04:00 PM. Reason: clarification |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
trying hard to be a better person
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 16,493
|
Inflamation of the brain doesn't cause pain in the brain itself, but it certainly causes pain in the head area because it restricts blood vessels etc. This is why people with brain tumours and concussion suffer from pain. It's not the brain itself that's hurting. It's all the other stuff up there.
__________________
Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Come on, cat.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
|
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children
Main results Fifty-one studies with 294,159 observations were included. Sixteen RCTs and 18 cohort studies were included in the analysis of vaccine efficacy and effectiveness. From RCTs, live vaccines showed an efficacy of 82% (95% confidence interval (CI) 71% to 89%) and an effectiveness of 33% (95% CI 28% to 38%) in children older than two compared with placebo or no intervention. Inactivated vaccines had a lower efficacy of 59% (95% CI 41% to 71%) than live vaccines but similar effectiveness: 36% (95% CI 24% to 46%). In children under two, the efficacy of inactivated vaccine was similar to placebo. Variability in study design and presentation of data was such that a meta-analysis of safety outcome data was not feasible. Extensive evidence of reporting bias of safety outcomes from trials of live attenuated vaccines impeded meaningful analysis. Authors' conclusions Influenza vaccines are efficacious in children older than two but little evidence is available for children under two. There was a marked difference between vaccine efficacy and effectiveness. No safety comparisons could be carried out, emphasizing the need for standardisation of methods and presentation of vaccine safety data in future studies. It was surprising to find only one study of inactivated vaccine in children under two years, given current recommendations to vaccinate healthy children from six months old in the USA and Canada. If immunisation in children is to be recommended as a public health policy, large-scale studies assessing important outcomes and directly comparing vaccine types are urgently required.
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Snowflake
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 13,136
|
Hello? They don't have to do a study because they already told us it's safe. What the hell is it with you conspiracy-spouting hippies and your infernal "what if" scenarios? How about this: "what if" you just shut up and do what you're told. Inject this shit into your baby for no reason.
__________________
****************** There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
Speaking of efficacy, did anyone else see the story yesterday about all the recalled H1N1 vaccine that had apparently lost its mojo.
lemme dig around. Here we go. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
IOW, the live/weakened nasal flu vaccine was efficacious, because it prevented flu 82% of the time, but was not effective, because it only prevented "flu-like symptoms", from viruses other than influenza, 36% of the time. The dead, injected vaccine was only 59% efficacious, so the nasal, live/weakened version is better at combating flu.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Come on, cat.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
|
Flu vacine efficacy is measure by antibody or titer response - beneficial results under ideal (lab) conditions. Effectiveness indicates the vaccines ability to work (ie. prevent flu) in real world conditions.
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
I'm going by what the Summary says:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Doctor Wtf
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
|
Saying "82% of illnesses were prevented" sounds awfully similar to saying "over a million jobs were saved".
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008. Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
Panel finds no digestion problem specific to autism
Just picked up a new kid with the diagnosis... major digestive issues suprise suprise. ![]()
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Here is a perfect example of how political this bullshit is.
From the AP, via boston.com: Quote:
Here is a press release from the National Autism Association regarding the exact same advisory paper: Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
For tw
Here are my son's DMSA results. First, the "before" data; i.e., urine collected for six hours immediately prior to giving the dose of medication. Note especially the Lead and Tungsten numbers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
And the "after" data; i.e., urine collected in the very next six hours on the same day, following a dose of DMSA. As you can see, most things are increased a little, nothing huge, but Lead has spiked way up. Even more than the graph makes it appear, actually, because they squashed each scale to fit on one page. Cadmium output, for example, is "elevated," but it's only a value of .7 when it should be a maximum of .5, so it's about 40% out of range. Lead, on the other hand, is at 33 when it should be at a maximum of 5, so it's 660% out of range, or six times higher than what is considered a safe amount of lead in the body.
Meanwhile, you may notice that Tungsten was a little elevated before the drug, and stayed right at the same level after the drug. From this we can infer that there's some higher-than-average source of Tungsten somewhere in his environment, but he's successfully processing and peeing it out without a problem, thus there was no extra Tungsten for the drug to grab. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|