All in favor of banning Emma the Troll?

[monster]

....and it's coming up to mod voting time....


hmmmmmmm....

[Griff]

Originally Posted by Undertoad

Don't worry, her dupe accounts keep moderators at work

When does her temp ban expire? Sounds like she may have trouble "keeping it real" but we've housebroken trolls before.

[xoxoxoBruce]

01-26-2010, 02:00 PM. But I expect the return to be short lived, as the child is fucked up, and I doubt we can help... but, I was wrong once back it '54.

[Sundae]

I doubt there will be a return.
She has a scorched earth policy, but is unlikely to go back and check for an oasis two months after the initial attack.

[Yznhymr]

Originally Posted by Radar

LOL @ Emmena

Instant classic!

[SamIam]

I dunno. She just came back as "severed penis" and promptly got kicked out again. I think that she is either going to grow up to be a high priced call girl and/or the 7th unknown victim of a serial killer.

[ZenGum]

I had considered the idea of having a thread for counselling for Emma, where she can post whatever she wants, and those who care can try to engage with her and see if we can help her sort herself out.

I decided against this. She has *serious* issues and needs serious, professional counselling (or psychotherapy). We are not qualified to take this job on, and can't guarrantee the reliability and steadiness of support she needs.

Emma, if you read this, speak to your school teacher or school counsellor about getting some regular sessions where you can talk about whatever is on your mind. Best of luck to you.

[Yznhymr]

Originally Posted by SamIam

I dunno. She just came back as "severed penis" and promptly got kicked out again. I think that she is either going to grow up to be a high priced call girl and/or the 7th unknown victim of a serial killer.

Do we get to vote on that one?

[classicman]

Originally Posted by Yznhymr

Instant classic!

Yo! I'm here.

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Originally Posted by Radar

My aptly putting her in her place, as I do so often with you, had nothing to do with her being a Christian, and everything to do with her, like you, being an arrogant, rude, witless, asshole who knows nothing but runs her mouth off constantly and accusing those who aren't Christians of being immoral.

It could be worse, she could have dishonestly claimed she was a libertarian when she's a flaming neocon who doesn't know the meaning of the word and accused others of having her own psychological disorders....like you.

You, amigo, are one lying sack of shit. First, you were not apt, you were abusive. You are by nature a belittler, not a freer. You chewed her ass for having religion, you son of a three-legged bitch. You have no class and you are the chiefest rude and witless asshole to disgrace my Cellar. Yes, insofar as these things are moral questions, you are intensely and deliberately immoral, which makes you a sack of shit -- by choice.

The one way I'm "rude" is that I am with-it enough to disagree with you. That's not rude. It is good sense. The ability to call a spade a spade, and tell a spade from a rake, is by no means remarkable either.

As a libertarian, I voted against Obama, and I was right from a libertarian view to do so, inasmuch as Democratic policy has been about as anti-libertarian as any large group of Americans is going to get. You'd have to go to small groups like the neo-Nazis and CPUSA to go more antilibertarian, and then it's just a matter of degree. Now you, OTOH, confused libertarianism with Radar worship -- something no sane, well-advised being does or will ever do. You shouldn't even be worshiping yourself, though I doubt I could stop you making that narcissistically disordered display. Your take on libertarianism has been unsatisfactory since first I knew you, and apparently you were and are the reason an older Cellar Dwellar remarked to me that it seemed to him Libertarians were mostly jerks.

Your entire body of postings gives evidence of a narcissistic personality disorder and your penchant for abusing people suggests some flavor of autism as well. You literally don't know any better. These are your qualities. Asberger's? Maybe. At any event, you behave like you can't even spell "psychological projection," which makes you not merely an SOB, but quite the stupid one as well. Remember, with you the midbrain always trumps the forebrain, and it has done so here once again -- your emotional makeup forbids ratiocination. No prospect of any improvement, either. Radar is a defective being.

Neocons actually fight tyrants -- naturally enough that would mean the neocons would in time come after your hide. Bend over and take it like the man you hardly know how to be. Libertarianism means and implements liberty, whereas tyrants don't. Naturally we must not only prepare for conflict with tyrants, we must win it too. Libertarianism is fundamentally a conservative philosophy, as libs and cons both reckon smaller government is better government. The only reason you're interested in that is because then you can be more grandiose than the State, if things were carried far enough. Conservatives may know their own worth very well, but as a rule, they are not self-aggrandizers. Certain televangelists do break that rule, true enough. But then there are all the rest of the conservatives.

[xoxoxoBruce]

You chewed her ass for having religion

Oh please, she has no religion. She squawks about it, and may even go through the motions of ceremony, but she's about as religious as a lunchbox.

[SamIam]

I think the pot is calling the kettle black. Given UG's supposedly high intellect, one would think that he could come up with more pithy terms than "lying sack of shit" among others.

Also, UG keeps going on and on about the atheist Democrats. I have no idea where he gets his information, but he scarcely comes off as a choir boy, himself.

Finally, I am amazed at your support of "libs" and "cons" when you are, in fact, a monacharist.

Contrary to the common historical view, Kuehnelt-Leddihn asserted that Nazism (National Socialism) was a leftist, democratic movement ultimately rooted in the French Revolution that unleashed forces of egalitarianism, identitarianism, materialism and centralization. He essentially argued that Nazism, fascism, radical-liberalism and communism were essentially democratic movements, based upon inciting the masses to revolution and intent upon destroying the old forms of society. Furthermore, Kuehnelt-Leddihn claimed that all democracy is basically totalitarian and that all democracies eventually degenerate into dictatorships

In Liberty or Equality, his magnum opus, Kuehnelt-Leddihn contrasted monarchy with democracy and presented his arguments for the superiority of monarchy: diversity is upheld better in monarchical countries than in democracies, monarchism is not based on party rule, and it "fits organically into the ecclesiastic and familistic pattern of Christian society.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_von_Kuehnelt-Leddihn

Bruce told me to read UT and Bruce was right. The man's a riot.

Oh, and for the record, I'm NOT defending Radar. Radar can get quite nasty without my help.

[Sundae]

Originally Posted by ZenGum

Emma, if you read this, speak to your school teacher or school counsellor about getting some regular sessions where you can talk about whatever is on your mind. Best of luck to you.

She's home schooled. And a bad advertisment for it I must say, given her lack of respect for anyone or anything.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Probably home schooled, because she's been thrown out of school.

[classicman]

they must have seen some of the pics she posted.