![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
View Poll Results: Does the US need a third party? | |||
Yes, anything is better than the two we have now |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 33.33% |
No, the Democrats and Republicans were good enough for grandpa, and they're good enough for me |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Nice thought, but impossible to implement for a variety of reasons |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 38.89% |
No, what we need is a revolution |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 16.67% |
Huh? Who me? I dunno |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 11.11% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | |
Doctor Wtf
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
|
Quote:
A third party in the current system would be exposed to the same corrupting environment that the other two exist in. That is what needs to be changed. Each candidate has to sell out for "campaign contributions" because if they don't, the other will, and will blow them out of the water. So they both do. The solution, of course, is to mumblemumblemumble . Although you might seriously consider preferential voting, at least for the Presidential election. And abolishing that electoral colleges business to eliminate the "battleground state" effect.
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008. Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|