![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
.....short for Caz
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The West Coast of England
Posts: 358
|
We use paper and pencil and every town count is rigourously observed throughout. A re-count is easy although clearly here in the UK the numbers are a great deal smaller than in the US so it might take longer. So what? How long did your last one take to reach a final number few people actually believed in?
__________________
..down by the zea zippin' zider ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
I would feel much more confident in a paper ballot where I fill in the ovals with a number two pencil. You can run it through the scanners as many times as you want, and the "chad" won't fall out. You can have a permanant record that you can go back to as many times as you want. You can even count them manually if you want to double-check the results of the scanners. Also, before I turn it in, I can visually see that my vote has been cast the way I want it to.
I have almost no faith in the electronic machines that my county has switched to in the last two years. (Not Deibold.) I trust my county officials are honest and mean well, but that's the only faith I have in the whole system. The technology is unproven. In fact, all the evidence points to the possibility of flaws in the technology. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|