Evolutionary Science-v- Creationism

richlevy · 08-03-2005, 07:49 PM

There is no proof for the the existence of God. That's why they call it faith. Science deals with facts or theories for which there is evidence. Saying that there might be a creator based on the unsubstantiated beliefs of individuals has no place in a science class.

I heard the end of a very bad debate on O'Reilly. They picked some poor Phd with no debating skills who by comparison made Nixon's performance in the Kennedy debate look like a screaming success. I swear that they picked the guy because O'Reilly could roll right over him.

08-03-2005, 07:49 PM	#11
richlevy King Of Wishful Thinking Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Philadelphia Suburbs Posts: 6,669	There is no proof for the the existence of God. That's why they call it faith. Science deals with facts or theories for which there is evidence. Saying that there might be a creator based on the unsubstantiated beliefs of individuals has no place in a science class. I heard the end of a very bad debate on O'Reilly. They picked some poor Phd with no debating skills who by comparison made Nixon's performance in the Kennedy debate look like a screaming success. I swear that they picked the guy because O'Reilly could roll right over him. __________________ Exercise your rights and remember your obligations - VOTE! I have always believed that hope is that stubborn thing inside us that insists, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us so long as we have the courage to keep reaching, to keep working, to keep fighting. -- Barack Hussein Obama

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)