Cancer should not exist. Part 1

[Happy Monkey]

Originally Posted by rtexanssane

peer review is not the bible.

Exactly. The Bible has to be accepted on faith. Peer review requires evidence. No number of testimonials has the credibility of one double-blind study, and multiple double-blind studes are best.

[OnyxCougar]

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

Exactly. The Bible has to be accepted on faith. Peer review requires evidence. No number of testimonials has the credibility of one double-blind study, and multiple double-blind studes are best.

Small but very crucial difference:

The bible itself is fact. It's the content of the writing within that (arguably) has to be accepted on faith.