10-12-2006, 03:21 PM
|
#1
|
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
Rockwell has a different opinion on Somalias "anarchy". Fifteen glorious years without a central government in Somalia! It was typically described as a "power vacuum," as if the absence of a taxing, regulating, coercing junta is an unnatural state of affairs, one that cannot and should not last.
Well, now this "vacuum" is being filled, with an Islamic militia claiming to be in control of the capital, Mogadishu.
But US officials may rue the day they hoped for a new government in this country. The dictator Mohammed Siad Barre fell in 1991. US troops went in with the idea that they would restore order, but thank goodness they did not. Bill Clinton's idea fell into shambles after 18 soldiers were killed by warlords. That seems like a low number in light of the Iraq disaster, but to Clinton's credit, he pulled out.
Since that time, Somalia has done quite well for itself, thank you (BBC: "Telecoms Thriving in Lawless Somalia"). But there was one major problem. The CIA couldn't come to terms with it. The US government likes to deal with other governments, whether it is paying them or bombing them or whatever. What makes no sense to central planners in DC is a country without a state.
So the US continued to talk about a "power vacuum" and secretly funneled money to its favorite warlords – a fact which the US officially denies but which has nonetheless been widely reported. Officials who have criticized the policy have been shut up and reassigned.
Of course this has little to do with r's point. We should probably start a gridlock party. Assess the situation each election cycle and support whichever option keeps the President, Congress, and Supreme Court at each others throats.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
|