Quote:
Originally posted by sycamore
Hmmm...eyewitnesses say a middle eastern-looking man fled the scene right after an incredibly traumatic event. Eyewitness testimony can be incredibly flawed...hmmm.
I'm not betting with those kind of odds.
|
Great point. Eyewitness testimony is the least reliable. That's why we need to have the Feds release the surveillance tapes from the surrounding buildings security systems. These have been confirmed to be under seal. You know, the ones that arent supposed to exist but yet have been verified to exist by a Federal judge looking into the FOIA suit. These tapes may very well show nothing. I would bet that there isn't anything convincing on them. The way they are playing with the evidence is suspicious though.
<a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/billoreilly/bo20021102.shtml"> As O'Reilly points out in a recent </a> article, it doesnt look like we'll be getting any answers on any topic in the near future.
<a href="http://www.indystar.com/print/articles/9/001153-8709-021.html">Here's the article that </a> says the tapes do exist.
<a href="http://www.fair.org/extra/0207/mcveigh.html">I also found this while looking for any credible evidence.</a> So the above article may be wrong. Who the hell knows? If Ashcroft would release the tapes maybe I could move on to another possible conspiracy. Like maybe the Malvo sniper case....misguided young sniper, or CIA operative?
My hard drive crashed and all my background info on the UN is gone. I'll get the original arguments posted when I can