![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
|
I paid $3.149 a gallon tonight...haven't broken the $40 fill-up mark yet, but I suspect I will within the next week.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
$3.17 in 2007 money is abuot $0.65 in 1972 money - which was the prices of a gallon of gas in 1972. So gasoline prices have only gone back up to early 1970s prices when gasoline was still cheap. No wonder SUV sales are not hurt. Anyone hurt by a gallon of gas at this price needs to review their excessive life style.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
in a mood, not cupcake
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,034
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Mystical Miscreant
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: asteroid B-12
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
![]() You've read about the obscene profits made in the petro industry, right? It's their excessive practices that should be reviewed, not whether the consumer might have an excessive lifestyle.
__________________
"One never ought to listen to the flowers..." - The Little Prince |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
You read about that part also? Or did your just assume that spectaculor profits by Exxon meant all are that profitable? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Mystical Miscreant
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: asteroid B-12
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
Is it coincidence that when they're making "record profits", we're paying high prices? Also, I'll admit your remarks about excessive lifestyles rubbed me the wrong way because it sounds like you're making assumptions and generalizations. Some people may live an excessive lifestyle, but plenty of them live in poverty and/or paycheck to paycheck and gas is just one more necessity that costs more (and more and more).
__________________
"One never ought to listen to the flowers..." - The Little Prince |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Exxon, et al may have bought oil pre-Katrina. By the time oil arrived, prices were post-Katrina. So Exxon, et al reported record profits while you "suffered". Exxon did not gouge. That is how markets work and for good reason. Meanwhile, what was not reported? What Exxon, et al paid for post-Katrina oil. And then oil dropped $10 per barrel. Which oil industry companies lost money when that happened - or did your news sources forget to report that part of the story? Again, if the oil industry is so profitable, then where are these major stockmarket price increases throughout that industry? They realized massive profits when oil went up and significant losses when oil went down. Last year, prices were also high. Naysayers accused oil industry of price gouging. But oil industry had long term contracts that HAD to be fulfilled. Why were oil prices so high? Because the industry was buying and storing oil anywhere that storage could be found. When a hurricane season never happened, then all that stored oil was sold. At what prices? At prices far below what was paid. That fall, oil companies took significant losses because they had to hoard oil to protect their long term contract obligations. Did your news reports include that? Why were those summer prices high? Oil industry had to do anything to have reserves should another shortage occur. The naive blamed greedy oil companies who, in reality, were only assuring oil would always be available. Prices properly sending messages to everyone as markets should. And those prices going up and down - insignificant. Welcome to market forces that don't get reported. Welcome to the losses last fall that were not widely reported. Most of the oil industry did not reap the massive profits as speculated. Otherwise oil industry stocks would have massively outperformed the market. So how big is this oil industry market? Last numbers I saw put Exxon at about 8% of the market. I don't see market gouging. I see volatile prices because prices typically would have to rise and fall $2 to $8 a gallon just to get people to respond according to supply variations. Price change from 2.30 to $3.17? Insignificant. Expect such variations to be normal. Welcome to a world now made so unstable by George Jr. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Losses are deducted before the record profits are announced.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice. --Bill Cosby |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
It does not get any better than this. If life is tough now, then one must make plans now for when times actually become tough. If one is living on the edge now, then one is already in serious trouble. If trivial price of gasoline is so harmful, then one must reassess one's precarious situation. TheMercenary demonstrates it. His boat holds 135 gallons. Will he stop using his boat? No. Price of gasoline has not increased significantly. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Remember what I had been saying years ago. Gas prices were way to low causing stifled innovation. Since I always look at the bigger picture, then I consider those price increases to be a very good thing. Did you notice how stifled innovations are suddenly become 'new breakthrough technologies'? These ideas existed. Why now are they suddenly 'new'? Some examples - hybrid technology which is based on concepts used in 1930s locomotives. CFL bulbs which have long been possible - I remember an article about building the circuits in Popular Electronics. A now defunct magazine which implies how long ago that technology existed. Energy prices were so low that a company notorious for stifling innovation was using SUVs to cover up their hateful management. GM executives get promoted by cutting costs - which means stifling innovation. SUVs only made such anti-Americans look good. SUVs only possible because energy had become the cheapest ever in mankind history. Way too ridiculously low as indicated by even the new BMW SUV with 500 horsepower. For those whose eyes glaze over when numbers are provided - the new BMW SUV has as much horsepower as the larger engines in the larger 18 wheel trucks. Why? Energy prices are just too low. A 30 second cloud. It was so much nicer yesterday. BTW when was the last time I drove a car that got less than 30 MPG? It was a 1969 Ford. And yet I read here MPG numbers such as 22; and that is good? That is pathetic. I have never had a Honda Accord average less than 30 MPG. Even my 1970s GM Chevy got 30 MPG - which is how long minimally acceptable technology has existed and avoided - because energy prices are too low. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Only looks like a disaster tourist
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
|
Well said, TW. When gas gets to $5/gallon, people will react - there is some movement already, but not enough. Most people and companies look only at simple economics (payback), and ignore long-term impacts of their decisions. I don't expect this to change, but the economics will change, and that will make all the difference.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Makes some feel uncomfortable
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|