![]() |
|
Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#22 | |||
Junior Master Dwellar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kingdom of Atlantia
Posts: 2,979
|
Quote:
Well, I don't have a problem with any of it in principle. I don't know if that's how it happened or not. I specifically am not putting my personal belief here because it's not relevant to the point I'm trying to make (which doesn't seem to be coming across.) Quote:
Well, the textbooks say theory one time and then act like it's the law of gravity, irrefutable. I'm not saying I want all of you to throw the Theory out the window as bullshit, or even that I want you to "consider God." I don't. I'm NOT one of those "pushy christians." All I'm trying to get across is that if you're going to teach one non provable theory of creation, you need to teach all of them. Quote:
I like you too, Whit, we generally see eye to eye on most issues. I wasn't trying to insult anyone. That's not my style. But, like Dave posted, not making a choice is, in fact, making a choice. Your stance on religion, whether it's important in your life or not, (although not relevant to this discussion) is your belief system. You have a belief system. EVERYONE does. What that belief system is could be anything. But it is there. And faith is a form of belief. See all the semantics posts Bruce and I engaged in. What you believe in doesn't matter. They are teaching nonobservable ideas as FACT and it's wrong. I keep repeating the same "bullshit" (:p @ Dave) because everyone (generally) seems to be thinking I'm against Evolution. I'm not. It's a great idea. But (for the millionth time) is not a FACT or a LAW of science. It's an IDEA presented as fact. And that is my only problem with it. Get it out of science class. Can you teach gravity? Yup. Physics? yup. Chemistry? Definetly. It doesn't hurt science to take Evolution out, does it? Biology is still the same. Nothing changes if you don't mention primordial soup, does it? That's because those subjects ARE science, backed by observable, duplicatable facts. Is anyone seeing the fundamental difference here?
__________________
Impotentes defendere libertatem non possunt. "Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth." ~Franklin D. Roosevelt |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|