I'm being set up by the Clintons

Because distribution of "illegal" paraphernalia is considered "more illegal" than consumption of illegal substances.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Rush was illegally obtaining and using legal drugs.

'sonly legal if you've got a prescription. Hence "illegal".

But I was more talking about illicit substances in general; distribution is always more "serious" than consumption.

[Rush Limballs]

Originally posted by greenian
why is Chong in jail for selling bongs online while Rush gets to chill in his 90 day rehab center on his own recognizance?

1) I'm not in a 90 day rehab. It's a 30 day.

2) I played a significant part in getting the reps elected and Asscroft his job.

3) I have assets in excess of 100 million bucks

4) I have video tapes of Asscroft mastrubating to gay porn (hey dont look at me, *he* made them).

[greenian]

ah, that explains it

[xoxoxoBruce]

Originally posted by dave
'sonly legal if you've got a prescription. Hence "illegal".

But I was more talking about illicit substances in general; distribution is always more "serious" than consumption.

If a 15 year old takes Extacy it's illegal and so is the drug.
If a 15 year old drinks alcohol it's illegal but the drug is not.
The law is harsher in the first case....double jeopardy. If you add distribution, usually "conspiracy to distribute", it's strike three. Yer out!