The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2010, 05:32 PM   #1
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
Hows about you two shitheads take the fucking nonsense somewhere else.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 05:37 PM   #2
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griff View Post
Hows about you two shitheads take the fucking nonsense somewhere else.
What nonsense is that?

The fact that the moratorium limiting permits to drill on the OCS goes back to 1981?

Or the fact that the Financial Services Modernization Act effectively repealed Glass Steagall and tore down the wall between commercial banking and investment banking?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 05:56 PM   #3
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
It is apparent you enjoy each other immensely but your banter is destroying discourse.
Attached Images
 
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 06:07 PM   #4
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griff View Post
It is apparent you enjoy each other immensely but your banter is destroying discourse.
You forgot to add IMHO... because that is all it is.
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 06:10 PM   #5
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
You forgot to add IMHO... because that is all it is.
And Griff, you neglected to answer my question....what nonsense is that?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 05:49 PM   #6
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griff View Post
Hows about you two shitheads take the fucking nonsense somewhere else.
Welll shithead, I see this as normal political banter. Tell us shithead why we should not have this exchange of banter on a political thread. Please shithead, tell us...
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 06:48 PM   #7
jinx
Come on, cat.
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griff View Post
Hows about you two shitheads take the fucking nonsense somewhere else.
Sucks man. I was interested...
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good.
jinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 06:56 PM   #8
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by jinx View Post
Sucks man. I was interested...
What a load of crap.

Classicman makes a comment:
...their requests to drill in shallower water were refused. Something about environmental concerns. hmmm
And I point out that it goes back to Reagan's moratorium.

along with MHO that the blame the environmentalist game is a load of crap as well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 07:23 PM   #9
jinx
Come on, cat.
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
Who fucking cares?! Not everyone plays team politics, some actually want to DISCUSS THE ISSUES. It was Reagan that offered up the last round of amnesty for illegal aliens - doesn't stop you from carping that the conservatives are all opposed to it.
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good.
jinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 07:36 PM   #10
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by jinx View Post
Who fucking cares?! Not everyone plays team politics, some actually want to DISCUSS THE ISSUES. It was Reagan that offered up the last round of amnesty for illegal aliens - doesn't stop you from carping that the conservatives are all opposed to it.
Please dont put words in my mouth or crap that you want to DISCUSS the ISSUES and I (we) dont.

IMHO, both Merc and I have toned down the rhetoric.

If you dont like what/how I (or we) post......ignore it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 07:59 PM   #11
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
Please dont put words in my mouth or crap that you want to DISCUSS the ISSUES and I (we) dont.

IMHO, both Merc and I have toned down the rhetoric.

If you dont like what/how I (or we) post......ignore it.
Peace.
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 07:39 PM   #12
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Close to shore drilling has been limited for awhile, probably 'not in my back yard' and 'out of sight, out of mind' thinking. Whereas out in deep water, it couldn't possibly mess up the shore areas, could it?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 08:05 PM   #13
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Close to shore drilling has been limited for awhile, probably 'not in my back yard' and 'out of sight, out of mind' thinking. Whereas out in deep water, it couldn't possibly mess up the shore areas, could it?
Yep for those reasons as well. It originally started back in 1982, when the Democratically led Congress restricted more and more areas through appropriations.
Through this annual process, Congress chose to deny the funding necessary to conduct leasing of new offshore areas to oil companies. The restrictions were renewed annually. This went on until recently through both R & D led congresses until the price for oil skyrocketed.

There have been several legislative efforts to eliminate them over the last couple years by the R's, but none none have been successful. They have been rebuked by the environmentally conscious D's and their majority in the house.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 09:32 PM   #14
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
Yep for those reasons as well. It originally started back in 1982, when the Democratically led Congress restricted more and more areas through appropriations.
What Democratic-led Congress was that?
In 1981, Congress voted to stop the sale of leases off the coast of Northern California. The moratorium was included in the Interior Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1982. The provision was supported by almost every member of the California delegation from both political parties. It was approved by the House and by the Republican-majority Senate, and signed it into law by President Reagan.

In 1982, Congress extended the moratorium for Northern California and expanded the area to include the Central California coast. The House also approved an amendment by Republican Congressman Jim Courter to prohibit leases off the coast of New Jersey. Again, the majority-Republican Senate approved the bill and Reagan signed it into law. In 1983, the moratoria on offshore leases were continued in Northern and Central California and were expanded to include Southern California, the Florida Gulf Coast, and the Georges Bank off the coast of New England. Republican and Democratic Members of the California and Florida delegations pushed for the moratoria. The Republican-majority Senate approved the Interior Appropriations Act and President Reagan signed it into law.

The Exxon Valdez spill off the Alaskan Coast in March 1989 increased environmental concerns. The Interior Appropriations Act for FY 1990 includes moratoria on leases off of California, Florida, Massachusetts, Bristol Bay of Alaska, and the Atlantic Ocean from Rhode Island to Maryland. President Bush signed the bill into law.
And then came the GHW Bush Executive Order
In June 1990, President George Bush announced a 10-year moratorium on drilling off California, Florida, and New England. The Interior Appropriations Act for FY 1991 included one-year bans on leases for areas not covered in Bush's order, including Bristol Bay in Alaska, the Florida Panhandle, and the Atlantic from New Jersey to Maryland.
You cant just make shit up about a Democratic-led Congress....when the Republicans controlled the Senate and/or the White House.

Quote:
There have been several legislative efforts to eliminate them over the last couple years by the R's, but none none have been successful. They have been rebuked by the environmentally conscious D's and their majority in the house.
And the Clinton and Bush years, with majority Republican Congress for most of those years.
From 1991 to 2007, the Interior Appropriations Act for each year included moratoria on drilling except off the coasts of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and parts of Alaska. There was no significant change in policy toward offshore drilling even though Republicans controlled Congress for twelve years from 1995 through 2006.
But you know all about the appropriations process....and its the Democrats fault.

Last edited by Redux; 06-26-2010 at 10:46 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.