Sept 18, 2010: Hosni Jumps Ahead

[Undertoad]

Can Conservatives write what they believe in without couching it in angry code?

[Pico and ME]

Originally Posted by Undertoad

Can Conservatives write what they believe in without couching it in angry code?

If you don't get conservatives angry, they don't vote. It's true of most voters, but the Republican Party has been cultivating fear and anger for so long now that it seems an integral part of their M.O. And yes, Im sorry, I still believe that you can interchange Republicans and Conservatives - at least since Reagan.

[Flint]

Originally Posted by Undertoad

Can Conservatives write what they believe in without couching it in angry code?

Voter Anger Palpable At Intentionally Anger-Stoking Rally

[xoxoxoBruce]

The real reason the founders chose a hands off policy, was because it was the only way to sell the revolution to a fractious bunch of colonies. After all, many if not most of the colonists had suffered shit from their previous nation because the rulers had chosen one religion over another. Now under English rule, the leaders were an ocean away and pretty much let these fractious groups do what the hell they wanted... as long as they paid taxes.

The real story of religion in the colonies and how the founding fathers dealt with it.

President Obama declared: “This is America. And our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country and that they will not be treated differently by their government is essential to who we are.” In doing so, he paid homage to a vision that politicians and preachers have extolled for more than two centuries—that America historically has been a place of religious tolerance. It was a sentiment George Washington voiced shortly after taking the oath of office just a few blocks from Ground Zero.

But is it so?

In the storybook version most of us learned in school, the Pilgrims came to America aboard the Mayflower in search of religious freedom in 1620. The Puritans soon followed, for the same reason. Ever since these religious dissidents arrived at their shining “city upon a hill,” as their governor John Winthrop called it, millions from around the world have done the same, coming to an America where they found a welcome melting pot in which everyone was free to practice his or her own faith.

The problem is that this tidy narrative is an American myth. The real story of religion in America’s past is an often awkward, frequently embarrassing and occasionally bloody tale that most civics books and high-school texts either paper over or shunt to the side. And much of the recent conversation about America’s ideal of religious freedom has paid lip service to this comforting tableau.

Much more.