![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
View Poll Results: Does the US need a third party? | |||
Yes, anything is better than the two we have now |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 33.33% |
No, the Democrats and Republicans were good enough for grandpa, and they're good enough for me |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Nice thought, but impossible to implement for a variety of reasons |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 38.89% |
No, what we need is a revolution |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 16.67% |
Huh? Who me? I dunno |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 11.11% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
|
UT, is that addressed to me?
If so: I can't see how anything I've suggested amounts to trickery. Quite the opposite: NotA and non-party politics removes much of the capacity for parties and individuals to run amuck, and, restoring extremely limited governance (proxyhood) is a simple return to the letter of the blueprint (the fed constitution). Again: not seeing the tyranny. Or: is expecting folks to take care of themselves, for themselves, largely by themselves, tyrannical? The trick and the tyranny is turning the presidency and congress into 'directors' when, properly, they all should be *'janitors'. The trick and tyranny is demanding my participation in anything beyond the minimal up-keep of what is supposed to be a bare bones infrastructure. *shrug* *only keeping the toilet of America **unclogged, not redecorating the whole damned house. **frankly: as long as the status quo IS the status quo, I'm glad the toilet is clogged and overflowing...as long as the 'governors' squabble and in-fight they leave 'me' alone.
__________________
like the other guy sez: 'not really back, blah-blah-blah...' |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|