The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2004, 08:43 AM   #1
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Don't drink the water

Washington D.C. had quite a scandal in the last year with extremely high levels of lead in the water. The biggest kicker, and the thing that made it a scandal was that the water company kept the test results quiet. There were numerous stories of kids and pregnant women drinking the tap water, without any knowledge it was unsafe. It was pretty scary for a while, since in Arlington, I get my water from D.C., and my house is old. We thought there was a fair chance we might have lead in our water. I got several test kits on the internet, and did many tests before I calmed down and saw that my water was safe.

Well, in an article in today's Washington Post, a review of several other cities shows that this isn't a problem in just D.C.

If you live in an older, East Coast city, you can't be sure that your water is safe. Several cities, including Philadelphia, Boston, and New York, routinely throw out test results that show high levels of lead in the water. They only report the low test scores to the EPA. They give a false sense of security to their customers when they claim that their lead levels are within EPA limits.

You can buy test kits online for about $10-20 a kit. It's what I did. If you have young children in your home, or are pregnant, you may consider it too.

The Post article requires filling out a form and registering for free, so here's the first third or so of it:
Quote:
Lead Levels in Water Misrepresented Across U.S.
Utilities Manipulate or Withhold Test Results to Ward Off Regulators
By Carol D. Leonnig, Jo Becker and David Nakamura
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, October 5, 2004; Page A01


Cities across the country are manipulating the results of tests used to detect lead in water, violating federal law and putting millions of Americans at risk of drinking more of the contaminant than their suppliers are reporting.

Some cities, including Philadelphia and Boston, have thrown out tests that show high readings or have avoided testing homes most likely to have lead, records show. In New York City, the nation's largest water provider has for the past three years assured its 9.3 million customers that its water was safe because the lead content fell below federal limits. But the city has withheld from regulators hundreds of test results that would have raised lead levels above the safety standard in two of those years, according to records.

The result is that communities large and small may have a false sense of security about the quality of their water and that utilities can avoid spending money to correct the problem.

In some cases, state regulators have helped the utilities avoid costly fixes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which is supposed to ensure that states are monitoring utilities, has also let communities ignore requirements to reduce lead. In 2003, records show, the EPA ordered utilities to remedy violations in just 14 cases, less than one-tenth of the number ordered in 1997.

Taken together, the records point to a national problem just months after disclosures that lead levels in the District's water are among the highest in the country, a problem the city's utility concealed for months. Documents from other cities show that many have made similar efforts to hide high lead readings, taking advantage of lax national and state oversight and regulations riddled with loopholes.

The Washington Post examined 65 large water systems whose reported lead levels have hovered near or exceeded federal standards. Federal, state and utility records show that dozens of utilities obscured the extent of lead contamination, ignored requirements to correct problems and failed to turn over data to regulators.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 08:54 AM   #2
Cyber Wolf
As stable as a ring of PU-239
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: On a huge rock covered in water, highly advanced moss and 7 billion parasites
Posts: 1,264
I wonder where Alexandria/Fairfax-Alexandria gets water from. I just know that on occasion you turn the tap on and the water looks fine but smells off. Fortunately, the only tap water I drink is first filtered for stuff like lead, things with phaelangii and other weird odds-and-ends. Can't abide the taste of straight tap water anyhow.
__________________
"I don't see what's so triffic about creating people as people and then getting' upset 'cos they act like people." ~Adam Young, Good Omens

"I don't see why it matters what is written. Not when it's about people. It can always be crossed out." ~Adam Young, Good Omens
Cyber Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 09:00 AM   #3
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Where is the lead coming from?

My own personal fix:
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 09:12 AM   #4
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
In D.C., they switched to a new, stronger, treatment for the water to deal with an intermittent problem with microorganisms in the water. That new treatment was a little more corrosive and caused lead to leach out of solder joints and even the relatively few old lead supply lines that were still in use. A few homes had somthing like 10,000 time the legal level for lead in the water. Those older homes had lead supply pipes that went from the water main to their house.

I forget the numbers, but I think there were several thousand houses in the DC area that still have lead supply pipes. In many cases, the homeowners had no idea.

Filters reduce the lead by something like 99%. If you are 10,000 times over the legal limit of lead, and your filter reduces that by 99%, then your filtered water will be 100 times the legal limit.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 09:24 AM   #5
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
I got my test kits for lead direct from the manufacturer. They are 9.99 each. I bought three of them and tested the water as it first came out of the tap, after letting it run for 1 minute, and then after letting it run for 5 minutes. Usually, in problem homes, the water that comes out after letting it run for 1 minute is the highest in lead level, because that is the water that was sitting in the supply pipe overnight, just soaking up the lead.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 09:26 AM   #6
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
I grew up on DC water.

I got a bit suspicious when they sent me a water testing kit, and never told me the results.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 09:35 AM   #7
Cyber Wolf
As stable as a ring of PU-239
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: On a huge rock covered in water, highly advanced moss and 7 billion parasites
Posts: 1,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt
Filters reduce the lead by something like 99%. If you are 10,000 times over the legal limit of lead, and your filter reduces that by 99%, then your filtered water will be 100 times the legal limit.
Which is a thousand times better than drinking the water straight!
__________________
"I don't see what's so triffic about creating people as people and then getting' upset 'cos they act like people." ~Adam Young, Good Omens

"I don't see why it matters what is written. Not when it's about people. It can always be crossed out." ~Adam Young, Good Omens
Cyber Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 12:44 PM   #8
marichiko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Clean water supplies are a problem everywhere, as well as lying water authorities. When I lived in the dinky town of Nucla, Colorado our water supply came from the San Miguel River. There are precisely 4 towns which get their water from that river - 3 of them are small, poor ranching and mining communities. On the top of the river in the mountains is the wealthy ski resort of Telluride/Mountain Village. With the haughty disdain of royalty for peasants, the town of Telluride dumped raw sewage into the San Miguel a year ago last summer. EVERYTHING became contaminated and the residents in the towns down valley had to drink bottled water for months. Telluride tried to absolve itself of all responsibility by claiming that the pollution was due to upstream "Manufacturing." The only thing upstream of Telluride is a couple of marmots and the peaks of several 14,000 foot mountains!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 12:53 PM   #9
Elspode
When Do I Get Virtual Unreality?
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Raytown, Missouri
Posts: 12,719
The PUR filters are a *very* cost-effective solution to bottled water. We had a Hinckley & Schmidt cooler for a couple of years. We paid something like $6.00 a bottle for the water, and $9.00/month for the cooler, and it got rather pricey.

Now, I can get three filters at Sam's Club for $40.00, and that gives me 300 gallons of filtered water. Even factoring in the $30.00 purchase of the filter housing unit (which gave me a filter included), that gives me the equivalent of 100 bottles of water for the cost of about 17.5 cents per gallon, and that drops as the filter housing amortizes out. All I give up is the pre-chilled water, which I can remedy using nice, filtered-water ice.
__________________
"To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog

Last edited by Elspode; 10-05-2004 at 12:56 PM.
Elspode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 04:58 PM   #10
jinx
Come on, cat.
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
Where is the lead coming from?
Often, it's added to the water supply in the form of silicofluoride (no, I won't stop harping about fluoride, it pisses me off). Arsenic too. Yum.
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good.
jinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 05:00 PM   #11
lookout123
changed his status to single
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
you know fluoride is a communist plot right?
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin
lookout123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 05:04 PM   #12
jinx
Come on, cat.
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by lookout123
you know fluoride is a communist plot right?
Well, no, it's more likely a capitalist plot.
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good.
jinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 05:06 PM   #13
lookout123
changed his status to single
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
no, my crazy ass social studies teacher back in the 5th grade told us all that it was a communist plot. if it wasn't true i wouldn't have been taught that in a public school.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin
lookout123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 05:39 PM   #14
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
It's an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 06:56 PM   #15
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
And my fix.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.

Last edited by xoxoxoBruce; 04-07-2007 at 05:59 PM.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.